Water and the Making of the Modern City
Publication Year: 2013
Published by: University of Pittsburgh Press
Download PDF (55.4 KB)
Download PDF (101.7 KB)
Download PDF (80.4 KB)
I also thank Professors Bill Baker, Laurel Carrington, Jan Dizard, Paula Findlen, Brad Gregory, Dick Judd, Michel LeGall, Martha Mc-Namara, Paul Seaver, Bill TeBrake, and Eric Weitz. I also owe thanks to colleagues Matthew Booker, Dan Cohen, Jared Farmer, Jules Gehrke, Rick Lopez, Chris Otter, Carol Pal, Jonathan Sadowsky, Priya Satia, ...
Download PDF (130.0 KB)
In 1844, the engineer James Smith explored the alleys and courts of Leeds, stepping through and around the cast-off filth of the poorest of the cityâs 170,000 inhabitants. He encountered heaps of waste that lingered for six months and the stench of drains that lacked any flushing water for unknown spans of time.1 Meanwhile, Dr. William Kay scouted ...
Chapter 1. Water and the Making of the Modern British City
Download PDF (370.6 KB)
The general picture of water supply in Britain before 1800 is varied, consisting of individual private sources, community sources, and small-scale commercial sources operated by single entrepreneurs or small groups more or less satisfying the needs ...
Chapter 2. Great Expectations: The First Efforts to Reform London with Water
Download PDF (2.8 MB)
The present arrangements of water supply are defective in âplenty, purity, pressure, and price,ââ wrote one commentator regarding London in 1849.1 Another added, âWe ought, by this time, to have learned that the very foundation of moral training in a London tenement is a pipe of wholesome water from the top to the bottom of the house.â2 For Londonâs would-be reformers, just as it was for the campaigners of Glasgow, Manchester, and Liverpool, social re-...
Chapter 3. âCommunism in Waterâ: A Strategy for Harnessing Water to Reshape Late Victorian London Society
Download PDF (3.7 MB)
On the eve of the twentieth century, Londonâs government attempted a radical program of urban reformation. Its plan comprised a re-theorization of the city itselfâa new concept of the relationship between people, the environment, urban technologies, and local government. Londonâs reformers believed that, as it was, the metropolis was a concentrated but disjointed and chaotic amalgamation of souls. Until then, the role of government had been to wade into ...
Chapter 4. From Engineering Modernization to Engineering Collectivization
Download PDF (406.6 KB)
...no society exists outside of nature, and nature is rarely beyond social influence. This relationship is most prominent in the city. In the city, humans rearrange natureâthe face of the landscape, bodies of water, vegetationâfor the purpose of facilitating productivity and supporting a large collection of humans. Urban inhabitants tend to think that in cities they are more free from the forces of nature than are their counterparts in the countryside, but that is ...
Chapter 5. An Alternative Vision of the Modern City, an Alternative Government of Water
Download PDF (1.1 MB)
From the mid-1890s into the new century, the Salisbury government clearly understood that to control the flow of water was to control the flow of power. In their dealings with the London County Councilâs attempts to take over water service in the capital, the Conservatives who controlled Britainâs government proved themselves deft practitioners of the craft of water politics. They obstructed the LCCâs bills seeking power to purchase Londonâs water ...
Download PDF (170.1 KB)
This story opens at a moment of change, on the eve of a period when the rapidly expanding urban environment forced a transformation in the nature of British urban government. In the growing industrial towns of the first half of the nineteenth century, industrial waste and the concentration of large populations created acute environmental ...
Download PDF (496.1 KB)
Download PDF (252.1 KB)
Page Count: 240
Illustrations: 5 line drawings
Publication Year: 2013
Series Title: History of the Urban Environment
Series Editor Byline: Martin V. Melosi and Joel A. Tarr, Editors