In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

B i b l i o g r aph y ................................... Ameriks, Karl. “Husserl’s Realism.” Philosophical Review 86, no. 4 (1977): 498–519. Angus, Ian. “Jacob Klein’s Revision of Husserl’s Crisis: A Contribution to the Transcendental History of Reification.” Philosophy Today 49 (2005): 204–11. Aristotle. “Posterior Analytics.” In The Complete Works of Aristotle. Vol. 1, edited by Jonathan Barnes, 114–66. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984. Bachelard, Suzanne. “Phenomenology and Mathematical Physics.” In Kockelmans and Kisiel, Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences, 413–25. ———. A Study of Husserl’s Formal and Transcendental Logic. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968. Ballard, Edward G., ed. Philosophy at the Crossroads. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1971. Belousek, Darrin W. “Husserl on Scientific Method and Conceptual Change: A Realist Appraisal.” Synthese 115 (1998): 71–98. Boehm, Rudolf. “Les sciences exact et l’ideal husserlien d’un savior rigoureux.” Archives de Philosophie 27, nos. 3–4 (1964): 424–38. ———. “The Meaning of the Phenomenological Critique of Science.” In Embree, Essays in Memory of Aron Gurwitsch, 375–90. Boyd, Richard N. “The Current Status of Scientific Realism.” In Leplin, Scientific Realism, 41–82. ———. “On the Current Status of Scientific Realism.” In Boyd, Gasper, and Trout, The Philosophy of Science, 195–222. ———. “Realism, Underdetermination, and a Causal Theory of Evidence.” Noûs 7, no. 1 (March 1973): 1–12. Boyd, Richard N., Philip Gasper, and J. D. Trout. The Philosophy of Science. Cambridge , MA: MIT Press, 1991. Brainard, Marcus. Belief and Its Neutralization: Husserl’s System of Phenomenology in “Ideas I.” Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002. Brown, Harold I. “Idealism, Empiricism, and Materialism.” New Scholasticism 47 (1973): 311–23. ———. Perception, Theory and Commitment: The New Philosophy of Science. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1977. Bruzina, Ronald, and Bruce Wilshire, eds. Phenomenology: Dialogues and Bridges. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1982. Buchdahl, Gerd. Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Science: The Classical Origins; Descartes to Kant. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969. 232 bibliography Bunge, Mario. Philosophy of Physics. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1973. Cahoone, Lawrence E. “The Interpretation of Galilean Science: Cassirer Contrasted with Husserl and Heidegger.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 17, no. 1 (1986): 1–21. Cairns, Dorion. “An Approach to Phenomenology.” In Faber, Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl, 3–18 Carnap, Rudolf. “The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts.” In The Foundations of Science and the Concepts of Psychology and Psychoanalysis, edited by Herbert Feigl and Michael Scriven, 38–76. Vol. 1 of Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1956. Carr, David. “Crisis and Reflection: An Essay on Husserl’s Crisis of the European Sciences , by James Dodd.” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 27, no. 1 (2006): 195–205. Cartwright, Nancy. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1999. ———. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983. ———. “The Reality of Causes in a World of Instrumental Laws.” In Boyd, Gasper, and Trout, The Philosophy of Science, 379–86. Casey, Timothy. “Medieval Technology and the Husserlian Critique of Galilean Science .” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 70 (1996): 219–27. Cataldo, Peter J. “Husserl on Galileo’s Intentionality.” Thomist 51, no. 4 (1987): 680–98. Cavaillès, Jean. “On Logic and the Theory of Science.” In Kockelmans and Kisiel, Phenomenology and the Natural Sciences, 353–409. Chisholm, Roderick M. Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1957. Cho, Kyung Kah, ed. Philosophy and Science in Phenomenological Perspective. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff , 1984. Churchland, Paul M., and Clifford A. Hooker, eds. Images of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985. Claesges, Ulrich, and Klaus Held, eds. Perspektiven transzendental-phänomenologischer Forschung. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972. Cohen, Robert S., and Marx W. Wartofsky, eds. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 2. New York: Humanities Press, 1965. Compton, John J. “Natural Science and the Experience of Nature.” In Phenomenology in America: Studies in the Philosophy of Experience, edited by James M. Edie, 80–95. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1967. ———. “Reinventing the Philosophy of Nature.” Review of Metaphysics 33, no. 1 (1979): 3–28. ———. “Some Contributions of Existential Phenomenology to the Philosophy of Natural Science.” American Philosophical Quarterly 25, no. 2 (1988): 99–112. De Boer, Theodore. The Development of Husserl’s Thought. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1978. ———. “The Meaning of Husserl’s Idealism in the Light of His Development.” In Tymieniecka, Analecta Husserliana 2:322–32. De Groot, Jean. “A Husserlian Perspective on...

Share