-
Slavery in the Shadow of Liberty
- Ohio University Press
- Chapter
- Additional Information
3 Paul Finkelman Slavery in the Shadow of Liberty The Problem of Slavery in Congress and the Nation’s Capital Few images of earlyAmericaweremorestriking,andjarring,than that of slaves in the nation’s capital. every day thousands of slaves movedaroundWashington,laboringonbehalfofthecity’swhitecommunity andthenation’sgovernment.Inthecapitalcityoftheworld’smostimportant freerepublic,slaveswereeverywhere.Hotels,restaurants,carriages —evenhousesofprostitution—usedslavelabor.Thehomesofthecity’s most prosperous residents were staffed by slaves rather than hired servants, as was common in the North. Livery stables used slaves to care for horses, and storesusedslavestocarrygoodstopatrons.Blackslaveswaitedonthesenators andrepresentativeswhomadethelawsfortheAmericanRepublic.Inalmost allwaysslavesservedandmaintainedthelegislators,bureaucrats,jurists,cabinet officials, military leaders, and even the presidents who lived and worked in theseatofpoweroftheworld’smostprominentdemocraticrepublic. Southern politicians, jurists, military officers, bureaucrats, and entrepreneurs broughttheirfavoriteservants—andoftentheirslavemistresses—with them when they represented their states, dedicated themselves to national service,orjourneyedtothenation’scapitaltoseekfameandfortune.Forthe southernerswhodominatedWashingtonsocietyandmadethecitywork, thepresenceofslavesseemednormalandevencomforting.Thenational capital reminded them of their southern homes and their southern way of life. Slavery in the District of Columbia also reinforced a sense that their “peculiarinstitution”remainedsecureinthenation,despitethegrowing 4 Paul Finkelman northernoppositiontohumanbondageandafterthe1830stheemergence ofmilitantabolitionism.Indeed,asenglandandothereuropeannations endedslaveryanddenounceditsimmorality,Americanmastersweresecure intheirnationalcapital,whereslaverywastherule.Despitegrowingopposition in the North to slavery, for most of the antebellum period northerners toleratedthecapitalcity’sslaveculture,althoughoftenwithasenseofdisgust .Foreignvisitorsmusthavebeenconfused,bewildered,orperhapsbemused bythesightofsomanyblackbondsmeninanationthatarrogantly proclaimeditselftobetheguardianoflibertyandtheembodimentoffreedom ,buttheyalsowereinvariablyforcedtoaccommodateit.Afterall,northerners ,diplomats,andotherforeignerscouldrarelyescapeslaveculture,even if they abhorred it. Slavery inevitably affected their lives, and they were served byslavesinboardinghouses,laundries,restaurants,theaters,andalmostevery establishmenttheypatronized. Othersightsofslaverywerelesscomfortingtosoutherners,whilecon- firmingtomanynorthernersandforeignvisitorsthehorrorsofslavery.Slaves, after all, were whipped, jailed, and chastised in public. More important, theyweresoldandsentsouth.Washingtonwasneveralargeslavemarket, but, as Don E. Fehrenbacher noted, the city was “an important depot in theinterstateslavetrade,”aslocalslaveswerepurchasedandothers,from Maryland, Delaware, or virginia, were marched across the District of Columbia in chains on their way to southern markets. Even southern politicians and leaders found this aspect of slavery unpleasant or worse. In 1802 agrandjurycomplainedaboutnonresidentscomingtothecity“forthe purposeofpurchasingslaves,wheretheyexhibittoourviewasceneof wretchednessandhumandegradation,disgracefultoourcharactersascitizens ofafreegovernment.”Sooffensivewasthistradethatinthewakeof the War of 1812CongressmanJohnRandolph,aslave-owningvirginian, proposedacongressionalinvestigationintothis“inhumanandillegaltraffic.”1 FromthefoundingofthecityuntilthepassageoftheCompromiseof1850 the nation witnessed persistent demands for an end to open commerce in slavesinthenation’scapital. yet,despiteRandolph’sprotest,andthoseofvariousslaveholdingresidents ofthecity,slavetradingwasinseparablefromslaveryitself.Itisimpossible tohavearegimebasedonpropertywithoutprovidingamarketforthat 1 Don E. Fehrenbacher, The Slaveholding Republic: An Account of the United States Government’s Relations to Slavery(Newyork,2001), pp. 66–67. [3.15.221.136] Project MUSE (2024-04-25 17:30 GMT) Slavery in the Shadow of Liberty 5 property.Slaveswereproperty,andWashington,D.C.,wasaslavecity,tothe satisfactionofitssouthernresidentsandtothedisgustof...