The Archaeology of Kinship: Advancing Interpretation and Contributions to Theory

Index

affinal/affines, 1, 15, 47, 49, 67, 110– 11, 114, 118, 120, 137, 144–47, 159, 163, 170, 189–90, 192, 205, 242, 244, 258–59, 261, 263, 291, 307, 308, 313, 314, 316, 317 agency, 8, 10, 12, 17, 19–23, 26–27, 30, 61, 109, 119, 131–32, 139, 193, 197–98, 204, 207–8, 210, 212, 214–18, 220–21, 224, 231, 233–34, 236, 242, 257, 261–63, 266, 269, 271. See also manipulation and negotiation Allen, william, 11, 13–14, 149 alliance. See marriage system ambilineal: archaeological interpretation, 67, 143, 147, 154, 169–70, 301; descent , 133, 143, 154, 307; descent groups/ramages, 21, 109, 111–12, 113, 127–29, 133, 137, 138, 139, 147, 200, 205, 220, 287–91, 292, 293, 297, 307; household groups, 45–47, 48, 49, 56–57, 67, 74, 111, 127, 297, 307 Hohokam ambilineal descent groups/ramages, 168–70, 171–72, 176, 181–88, 190–91, 241, 243– 44, 246, 248, 250, 251, 253, 260–64, 265–68, 270, 280–81, 287–91, 292, 293, 297 Hohokam ambilineal household groups, 74, 78, 97, 98, 181, 188, 297 ambilocal: archaeological interpretation, 67– 68, 301–2; residential groups, 6, 45–47, 111, 273, 280, 281, 293, 307 Hohokam ambilocal residential groups, 89, 188, 248, 280–81 ancestors, 18, 21, 25, 41, 44, 65, 66– 67, 98, 109, 111, 114, 116–17, 119, 121–22, 123, 125, 127, 129, 131–34, 136, 139, 170, 181, 192, 193, 200–201, 205, 208, 220, 229, 240, 242, 245, 262, 266, 289, 290, 293, 298 avunculocal: archaeological interpretation, 68, 141, 142, 155, 156–57, 159; avunculocality, 7, 25–26, 51, 58, 136, 143, 274, 282, 297, 303, 307 Hohokam avunculocality, 77, 80, 89, 91, 93, 165, 166–67, 171, 190, 239, 260, 282–83 Barnes, robert, 213 bilateral: archaeological interpretation, 141, 142–44, 147–48, 150–52, 154– 60; bilateral descent, 6, 8, 15, 48– 49, 52–54, 109, 113, 128–31, 133–34, 138–39, 143, 147–48, 200, 205–6, 210, 212, 221, 222– 24, 226–27, 228, 230, 231, 236, 273, 281, 285, 291–93, 307 Index 348 Index bilateral (continued) Hohokam bilateral descent, 162–63, 165–66, 168, 170, 174, 176, 182–83, 186, 188–89, 190–93, 237, 238, 241, 243, 244, 246–51, 258–60, 261–62, 266, 268, 270– 71, 281, 285, 292, 297 bilocal: archaeological interpretation, 67– 68; residential-household group, 6, 15, 47–49, 54, 56, 57, 130, 133, 142–44, 155, 210, 227, 236, 273, 281–82, 285, 288, 292–93, 301, 302, 307–8 Hohokam bilocal residentialhousehold groups, 74, 80, 89, 97– 98, 165–68, 170, 173–74, 176, 179–80, 182, 183, 186, 188, 190–92, 237–38, 241–46, 248– 49, 250–51, 259–71, 281–82, 283, 285, 287–89, 295–96 Boas, franz, 15, 130 capitalism, 3, 18, 26, 115, 141–42, 198, 199, 202, 204–5, 206, 272, 283–85, 286, 297, 298. See also private property and proletarianization Carr, Christopher, 61–62, 157 cemetery: kin groups, 61–63, 65–68, 141–42, 157–58, 160, 228–29, 231, 232, 302 Hohokam cemeteries, 32, 87, 94– 99, 101–2, 164–66, 168, 170–72, 174, 176, 179, 181–83, 185, 192, 242–44, 248, 250, 260, 261, 263, 265–66, 267, 283 ceremony: marriage, competition, and surplus production, 20, 133, 152, 153, 197, 201, 210, 212, 214–19, 227–31, 235, 236, 293–96, 297; social organization, 11, 20, 119, 123, 197 Hohokam ceremony, 34–35, 174, 185, 187–88, 191, 235, 237, 238, 239, 242–46, 250, 251–53, 258, 261, 262, 263, 264–68, 270 Chang, Kwang-chi, x, 19, 37, 149–52, 154, 155 Civano phase, 33–34, 91, 99–102, 104, 105, 161, 176, 180, 181, 183–84, 186–88, 191, 193–94, 250–51, 253, 267–68, 270, 271, 281, 282, 290, 292, 295–96 clan. See descent groups, clan. See also matrilineal and patrilineal cognatic: descent, 13, 15, 110, 126–28, 130, 143, 147, 154, 197, 206, 242– 243, 280, 289, 291 Hohokam cognatic residential groups, 70, 72–80, 83–91, 93–94, 97–105, 162–63, 165–67, 169– 73, 180–83, 187–90, 192, 243, 249, 253, 258, 261–62, 263, 270, 281, 284, 301 residential groups, 15, 45–47, 56, 64, 67–68, 301. See also ambilineal and bilateral community patterns, 7, 19, 71, 144– 47, 150–52, 155–60, 162–91, 229–30, 233, 246, 269–70, 275, 300...