We cannot verify your location
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR

Private Pensions and Public Policies

edited by William G. Gale, John B. Shoven, and Mark J. Warshawsky

Publication Year: 2004

The private pension system, together with Social Security, has provided millions of Americans with income security in retirement. But over the past thirty years, pension coverage has stagnated, leaving behind some vulnerable groups. Defined contribution plans have exposed workers to greater investment risk, while cash balance and other hybrid plans may have adverse effects on older workers caught in the transition. Pension regulations, infamous for their complexity, can be bewildering to policy analysts and policymakers. Private Pensions and Public Policies sheds timely and much-needed light on specific issues within the broader context and framework of pension reform. Contributors focus on topics that must be addressed in any reform effort, including the effects of the shift in emphasis toward defined contribution plans (after the 1974 Employee Retirement Income and Security Act) and hybrid plans (from the 1990s); regulatory issues such as nondiscrimination rules and contribution limits; how to increase the information available to participants and improve financial education; how participants in defined contribution plans make choices on questions such as asset allocation, back-loaded versus front-loaded saving, and annuities versus lump sum distributions; and the interaction of the private pension system with Social Security. Contributors include Robert L. Clark (North Carolina State University), Sylvester J. Schieber (Watson Wyatt Worldwide), Richard A. Ippolito (George Mason University School of Law), Alan L. Gustman (Dartmouth College), Thomas L. Steinmeier (Texas Tech University), John Karl Scholz (University of Wisconsin), Dean M. Maki, (JPMorgan Chase), William Even (Miami University of Ohio), Jagadeesh Gokhale (American Enterprise Institute), Laurence J. Kotlikoff (Boston University), Mark J. Warshawsky (TIAA-CREF Institute), Annika Sunden (Boston College), Andrew A. Samwick (Dartmouth College), David A. Wise (Harvard University), Joel Dickson (The Vanguard Group), Peter Merrill (PriceWaterhouseCoopers), Kent Smetters (Wharton School), Yuewu Xu (TIAA-CREF Institute), Janemarie Mulvey (Watson Wyatt Worldwide), Peter Orszag (Sebago Associates, Inc.), James M. Poterba (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), John B. Shoven (Stanford University), Clemens Sialm (University of Michigan), Leslie E. Papke (Michigan State University), Jeffrey R. Brown (Harvard University), and Michael Hurd (RAND Corporation).

Published by: Brookings Institution Press

Title Page

pdf iconDownload PDF (35.2 KB)
 

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF (42.7 KB)
pp. v-vi

read more

Foreword

pdf iconDownload PDF (36.4 KB)
pp. vii-viii

The creation of a lengthy, well-funded period of retirement at the end of most working lives has been one of the most striking economic transitions over the past century. In 1900, nearly two out of every three men aged 65 or older were in the work force. By 2000, the comparable figure had fallen to less than one in five. This is a historic achievement, but it also creates new...

read more

1. Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF (82.5 KB)
pp. 1-10

The private pension system is an intriguing combination of successes and failures. In conjunction with Social Security, private pensions have helped provide millions of Americans with adequate and secure retirement income. Pensions help employers manage their work force and provide incentives to employees. Pensions also help employees plan and save for retirement. Yet pension coverage has stagnated over the last thirty years, and certain...

read more

2. The Transition to Hybrid Pension Plans in the United States: An Empirical Analysis

pdf iconDownload PDF (205.1 KB)
pp. 11-56

Over the past three decades, pension coverage rates have remained fairly constant, but the composition of pensions has changed dramatically. Plan sponsors have shifted away from defined benefit plans and chosen to offer defined contribution plans instead, especially 401(k) plans. This change has occurred primarily among smaller employers, but according to a recent Fortune list, sixteen of the largest one hundred publicly traded corporations in the...

read more

3. What People Don't Know about Their Pensions and Social Security

pdf iconDownload PDF (255.6 KB)
pp. 57-125

The role of employer-provided pensions and Social Security in shaping employees’ retirement and saving behavior has attracted an enormous amount of attention from both researchers and policymakers over the past twenty-five years.1 In the research literature, the almost universal assumption is that workers are fully informed about the rules governing their employer- and government-provided pensions. However, to the limited extent that researchers...

read more

4. Financial Education and Private Pensions

pdf iconDownload PDF (113.5 KB)
pp. 126-145

Because of the shift in the United States over the past two decades from defined benefit pension plans to defined contribution plans, American households increasingly shoulder the responsibility of planning for retirement.1 To take full advantage of the opportunities now available, households must possess sufficient financial knowledge to make wise decisions. Bernheim (1998) raises concerns about whether households are financially literate enough to make...

read more

5. Life-Cycle Saving, Limits on Contribution to DC Pension Plans, and Lifetime Tax Benefits

pdf iconDownload PDF (179.0 KB)
pp. 146-188

It is now more than a quarter of a century since the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) was passed. ERISA regulates employer-sponsored tax-favored vehicles for retirement saving, including defined contribution (DC) pension plans; a key element of the law’s provisions governing DC plans is to limit the amount of tax-deductible contributions. In both nominal and, especially, inflation-adjusted terms, those limits have been tightened over the years....

read more

6. The Effects of Social Security Reform on Private Pensions

pdf iconDownload PDF (156.1 KB)
pp. 189-219

Over the past decade, two primary factors transformed the Social Security program from the “third rail” of American politics to a leading reform issue of the day. The first was the report of the 1994–96 Advisory Council on Social Security,1 which focused renewed attention on the financial crisis in the Social Security system.2 Though unable to agree on a single proposal to resolve the crisis, three subgroups of members of the council devised plans with varying...

read more

7. Pension Choices with Uncertain Tax Policy

pdf iconDownload PDF (105.0 KB)
pp. 221-236

Traditionally, almost all pension plans and tax-preferred saving incentive vehicles in the United States contained what has become known as front-loaded tax incentives. In particular, the initial contribution was deductible from income, and the investment returns generated no tax liability until they were withdrawn, when they were taxed as ordinary income. Examples of front-loaded plans include defined benefit pensions, 401(k) plans, Individual Retirement...

read more

8. The Design and Cost of Pension Guarantees

pdf iconDownload PDF (126.5 KB)
pp. 237-258

The U.S. Social Security system faces a substantial long-term financial shortfall. Some have advocated using personal accounts to help resolve the problem. Others support increasing the extent to which the existing system is prefunded by contributions that are made in advance of benefit payments. It is also possible to combine the two approaches. Much of the academic and policy discussion of these alternatives has proceeded under the assumption that each...

read more

9. Effects of Nondiscrimination Rules on Pension Participation

pdf iconDownload PDF (153.7 KB)
pp. 259-289

One of the central reasons policymakers provide tax subsidies for pensions is to raise pension coverage and benefit levels, especially among low- and moderate-income workers.1 To achieve this goal, Congress has established and periodically revised nondiscrimination standards that pension plans must meet in order to qualify for tax subsidies. In broad terms, the nondiscrimination rules require that coverage and benefits for low-wage employees maintain at least...

read more

10. Asset Location for Retirement Savers

pdf iconDownload PDF (220.7 KB)
pp. 290-331

Deciding how much of a portfolio to allocate to different types of assets is one of the fundamental issues in financial economics. For taxable individual investors, the proliferation of tax-deferred vehicles for retirement saving, such as individual retirement accounts (IRAs), 401(k) plans, Keogh plans, and 403(b) plans, has added a new dimension to the historical asset allocation problem. A taxable investor needs to make choices not just about the amount to...

read more

11. Longevity-Insured Retirement Distribution from Pension Plans: Market and Regulatory Issues

pdf iconDownload PDF (233.5 KB)
pp. 332-381

The method of funding retirement in the United States is in the midst of a major transition, one that is placing greater responsibility on individuals for managing their own retirement assets. The past two decades have witnessed a large shift away from defined benefit to defined contribution pension plans, a trend that appears likely to continue for the foreseeable future. According to some estimates, the average retiree’s balance in 401(k) plans alone will rise...

Glossary

pdf iconDownload PDF (78.2 KB)
pp. 383-392

Contributors

pdf iconDownload PDF (50.6 KB)
pp. 393-394

read more

Acknowledgments

pdf iconDownload PDF (33.8 KB)
pp. 395-

The editors would like to thank Julia Niemiec, Catherine McLoughlin, and Shannon Leahy for expert assistance. In addition, thanks go to Valerie Norville ,Eileen Hughes, and Marty Gottron for providing editorial support as well as...

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF (76.4 KB)
pp. 397-406


E-ISBN-13: 9780815796428
E-ISBN-10: 0815796420

Page Count: 406
Publication Year: 2004