We cannot verify your location
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR
title

Lives in the Balance

Asylum Adjudication by the Department of Homeland Security

Andrew I. Schoenholtz

Publication Year: 2014

Although Americans generally think that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is focused only on preventing terrorism, one office within that agency has a humanitarian mission. Its Asylum Office adjudicates applications from people fleeing persecution in their homelands. Lives in the Balance is a careful empirical analysis of how Homeland Security decided these asylum cases over a recent fourteen-year period.
 
Day in and day out, asylum officers make decisions with life-or-death consequences: determining which applicants are telling the truth and are at risk of persecution in their home countries, and which are ineligible for refugee status in America. In Lives in the Balance, the authors analyze a database of 383,000 cases provided to them by the government in order to better understand the effect on grant rates of a host of factors unrelated to the merits of asylum claims, including the one-year filing deadline, whether applicants entered the United States with a visa, whether applicants had dependents, whether they were represented, how many asylum cases their adjudicator had previously decided, and whether or not their adjudicator was a lawyer. The authors also examine the degree to which decisions were consistent among the eight regional asylum offices and within each of those offices. The authors’ recommendations­, including repeal of the one-year deadline­, would improve the adjudication process by reducing the impact of non-merits factors on asylum decisions. If adopted by the government, these proposals would improve the accuracy of outcomes for those whose lives hang in the balance.
 
Andrew I. Schoenholtz is Visiting Professor and Director of the Center for Applied Legal Studies at Georgetown University Law Center. He is Deputy Director of the Institute for the Study of International Migration at Georgetown University School of Foreign Service.
 
Philip G. Schrag is Delaney Family Professor of Public Interest Law and Director of the Center for Applied Legal Studies at Georgetown University Law Center.
 
Jaya Ramji-Nogales is Associate Professor of Law at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law.

Published by: NYU Press

Title Page, Frontispiece, Copyright, Dedication

pdf iconDownload PDF (117.7 KB)
 

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF (77.3 KB)
pp. vii-viii

List of Figures and Tables

pdf iconDownload PDF (72.3 KB)
pp. ix-xiv

Acknowledgments

pdf iconDownload PDF (73.7 KB)
pp. xv-xvi

read more

Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF (91.2 KB)
pp. 1-6

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), established by Congress in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, is the third-largest federal agency, with more than 180,000 employees.1 Most of its many functions are well known to the public and associated with national security or law and order. The department seeks to protect the nation against future terrorist...

read more

1. Seeking Refuge

pdf iconDownload PDF (119.2 KB)
pp. 7-16

The United States was settled in part by waves of refugees, including the Pilgrims and Puritans, seeking freedom from religious and political persecution. Nevertheless, laws, regulations, and government programs to protect refugees systematically and apolitically are of surprisingly recent vintage, dating only from 1980...

read more

2. The Applicants and the Adjudicators

pdf iconDownload PDF (532.8 KB)
pp. 17-40

This study analyzes a database drawn from the Department of Homeland Security’s RAPS system, providing information about 552,760 asylum applications filed between the beginning of FY 1996 and June 8, 2009.1 We studied only the cases in which the applicants were really seeking asylum (as opposed to another form of relief) and were actually interviewed by asylum...

read more

3. The One-Year Filing Deadline

pdf iconDownload PDF (90.0 KB)
pp. 41-48

The first step, for an asylum officer who is analyzing a new asylum application, is the determination of whether the claim was filed on time. This new twist to the asylum standard took effect on April 16, 1998, as part of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA). Although the Refugee Act provides that any person from another nation...

read more

4. Timeliness

pdf iconDownload PDF (446.8 KB)
pp. 49-68

The Department of Homeland Security’s data reveal interesting and at times surprising patterns in asylum officer determinations of whether asylum seekers filed within the permitted one-year period.1 This chapter describes basic but crucial information about the deadline—what percentage of asylum claims were determined to have been filed late and how late these claims...

read more

5. The Rejections

pdf iconDownload PDF (786.9 KB)
pp. 69-100

In chapter 4, we reviewed the numbers and demographic characteristics of applicants who did not establish to the satisfaction of asylum officers that they filed their asylum applications within one year of entering the United States. We saw that 92,622 individuals, 30.5 percent of all affirmative asylum applicants, fell into this “untimely” category during the period of our...

read more

6. Four Eras of Asylum Adjudication: Grant Rates over Time

pdf iconDownload PDF (340.2 KB)
pp. 101-120

During the fourteen-year period we studied, DHS granted asylum to 45 percent of the 329,336 asylum seekers who applied on time or qualified for an exception to the one-year deadline.1 Two factors should most strongly affect whether a particular applicant wins or loses. The first is whether the applicant’s home country is a human rights abuser (very few British people win asylum, but...

read more

7. Perceptions about the Asylum Seekers

pdf iconDownload PDF (323.6 KB)
pp. 121-142

In chapter 6, we explored asylum adjudication over time, investigating the relationship between grant rates and changes in laws, policies, and politics. In this chapter, we shift our focus to examine variables that may have shaped asylum officers’ perceptions of the asylum seekers. We start by discussing the ways in which two sociological characteristics of the applicants—their...

read more

8. Variations across the Regional Asylum Offices

pdf iconDownload PDF (351.2 KB)
pp. 143-162

Up to this point, we have examined changes in the grant rate over time and the impact of officer perceptions of the asylum applicants on grant rates. In this chapter, we shift our focus to the asylum offices as the locus of decision making, looking at variations across these offices. As the map at the front of this book shows, all of these offices have very large catchment areas; all...

read more

9. Disparities within Asylum Offices

pdf iconDownload PDF (309.2 KB)
pp. 163-176

In Refugee Roulette, we reported that asylum officers within some of the regional offices, to whom cases were randomly assigned, granted asylum at very different rates, even to nationals of the same country or group of countries. We now return to that issue, using the database from which the studies in the three previous chapters were drawn. This chapter reports on disparities...

read more

10. The Asylum Officers

pdf iconDownload PDF (413.6 KB)
pp. 177-196

In chapter 9, we saw that there was great variability among the grant rates of asylum officers deciding similar cases within the same regional office. What might account for these striking disparities? One asylum officer with whom we spoke closed our interview by saying “there are so many factors that play into the data—the age of the asylum officer, whether they have an old or a new...

read more

11. Conclusions

pdf iconDownload PDF (200.9 KB)
pp. 197-224

By enacting the asylum provisions of the Refugee Act of 1980, Congress gave hope to tens of thousands of people who must flee their countries every year to escape persecution and find safety in the United States. The asylum provisions of the Refugee Act are administered, in the first instance, by a corps of civil servants who remain dedicated to fair adjudication despite overwhelmingly...

Appendix: Catchment Areas of the Eight Regional Asylum Offices

pdf iconDownload PDF (57.7 KB)
pp. 225-226

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF (297.8 KB)
pp. 227-268

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF (133.7 KB)
pp. 269-270

About the Authors

pdf iconDownload PDF (42.9 KB)
 


E-ISBN-13: 9780814708774
Print-ISBN-13: 9780814708767
Print-ISBN-10: 0814708765

Page Count: 288
Publication Year: 2014

Research Areas

Recommend

Subject Headings

  • Asylum, Right of -- United States.
  • Political refugees -- Legal status, laws, etc. -- United States.
  • Political refugees -- Government policy -- United States.
  • United States. Department of Homeland Security.
  • Administrative procedure -- United States.
  • Emigration and immigration law -- United States.
  • You have access to this content
  • Free sample
  • Open Access
  • Restricted Access