-
Index
- NYU Press
- Chapter
- Additional Information
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Index Acculturation theory, 71–72 Bicultural gender role strain: and accul turation, 71–73; definition, 36–37, 39–41; in elaborative coding, 105; extending gender role strain, 95; in Haitian fathers, in Latino fathers, 86; as motivation for change, 72; as a theo retical construct, 68; transparent, com municable, and coherent, 84–87; in theoretical sampling, 93–95. See also Gender role strain Bottomup coding, 104 Central case sampling, 96–97; Promise Keepers, 100 Coherence, 84–85 Collaborative coding: definition, 61; in participant action research, 129 Communicability, 84–85 Convenience sampling: definition, 18–19; in Promise Keepers study, 98, 100; in theoretical sampling, 93, 96; in Yeshiva Fatherhood Project, 8, 128 Critical case sampling, 96–97; Promise Keepers, 100 Degendered parenting, 26 Diversity: in Haitian fathers study, 15; an hypothesistesting research, 24–26; qualitative research as a tool for, 26–27; and random sampling, 18; as a research issue, 15; and transferability, 86–87; in the Yeshiva Fatherhood Project, 4–6 Elaborative coding, 104–122 Extreme case sampling, 96–97 Feminist perspective: and Haitian fathers, 83; and Promise Keeper fathers, 101, Appendix C; as theoretical framework, 71, 99, 125 Focus groups: coding transcripts, 55; as group interview, 7–8 Gay fathers: and diversity, 4–6; extreme case sampling, 96; focus group inter viewer, 16; heterosexist bias, 28; need for an outside consultant, 45; as non dominant group, 128; as part of Yeshiva Fatherhood project, 9; and standardized questions, 16; as a strat egy for diversity, 26 Gender role strain: in elaborative coding, 118–121; in recent publication, 9; and theoretical saturation, 102. See also Bi cultural gender role strain; Pleck, Joseph Generalizability, vii, 17–19, 24, 77–78, 80–82, 86–91, 95 Grounded theory, 7, 14–20, 31, 35, 86–87 202 ❙ Index Haitian fathers. See Bicultural gender role strain; Chapter 2; Appendix B Hypothesisgenerating, 126. See also Chapter 1; Chapter 2 Hypothesistesting, 126–128. See also Chapter 1; Chapter 2; Chapter 3 Justifiability of interpretations, 78, 82–87 Memos, use of: building repeating ideas, 55; building themes, 62; in elaborative coding, 107–113; when selecting rele vant text, 47–53, Appendix A Mishler and Steinitz, 129 Narrative interview, 16–17, 21, 101 Naturalistic observation, 24–25 Nondominant groups, 126–130 Orphan: text and repeating idea, 57–60; theme, 64, 69–73, 110 Paradigm case sampling, 96, 97 Participatory action research, 129–130 Pleck, Joseph, 40, 71, 94–95 Political case sampling, 96, 98; and Promise Keepers, 100 Power sharing, 126–130 Promise Keeper fathers, Chapter 9, Chap ter 10, Appendix C Random sampling, 14; versus theoretical sampling, 17–19, 93–95, 102 Reflexivity, 27–28, 126 Relevant text: general coding of, 35–41; grouping into repeating ideas, 54–59; how to select, 46–53; master list from Promise Keeper study, 111, Appendix A; using elaborative coding, 107–115 Reliability, in qualitative research, 77–87 Repeating ideas: building a theoretical narrative, 74; general coding, 35–41; grouping into themes, 61–66; master list, 59–60, 63; and transparency, 84; transferability, 86; using elaborative coding, 105, 110–117, Appendix A Representative sampling, 80–82, 93–95, 102, 127 Research concern, versus research hypoth esis, 15–16, 19–21; coding, Chapter 4, Chapter 5; in participant action re search, 129, Appendix A; in theoretical narrative, 74–76; in your next study, 93, 99–103, 105–107 Role strain, 31, 36–37, 39–41; gender role, 71. See also Bicultural gender role strain Rubin and Rubin, 84 Sensitive case sampling, 96, 98, 100 Similar case sampling, 96–97 Snowball sampling, 8, 18, 21 Starter idea, for first theme, 55, 62, 116 Starter text, for first repeating idea, 57–58, 112–113, Appendix A Starter theme, for first theoretical con struct, 69–71 Themes: general coding, 35–41; by grouping repeating ideas, 61–74; trans parency, 84–87; using elaborative cod ing, 105, 115–120, 135–138 Theoretical constructs: general coding, 35–41; by grouping themes, 67–74; naming, 71–73; relation to broader theory, 68; refining through elaborative coding, 104–122, 136–138; in theoret ical narrativem 74–76 Theoretical framework, 33, 39–40, 43–46; and theoretical constructs, 67–68, 71, 76; in your next study, 99–103, 137–138 Theoretical narrative: and coherence, 85; constructing, 43; definition, 35–41; from elaborative coding, 105, 121–122, 137–138; using theoretical constructs, 67, 73–76 Theoretical sampling versus random sam pling, 17–21, 91–99; for your next study, 100–103...