In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

references Q 3, 162 — EECh 1, 509, E. Prinzivalli CXIX. DIODORE THE BISHOP iodore, bishop of Tarsus,1 while still a priest at Antioch achieved great fame. Works of his that are extant include his Commentaries on the Apostle Paul2 and many others,3 which reflect the method of Eusebius of Emesa,4 for, while he followed his meaning, he could not imitate his style because he had no knowledge of secular literature.5 notes 1. L. Abramowski, “Le prétendue condemnation de Diodore de Tarsé en 449,” RHE 60 (1965): 64ff.; J. R. Pouchet, “ Les rapports de Basile de Césarée avec Diodore de Tarse,” BLE 87 (1986): 243–72. 2. CPG 3819. 3. His works included the following: Fragmenta in Octateuch, CPG 3815; Fragmenta in Reges, I, II, CPG 3816; Fragmenta in Exodum (Latin), CPG 3817; Fragmenta in Psalmos, CPG 3818, for the text of which see CCG 6 (Ps. 1–50), ed. J. M. Olivier (Turnholt, 1980); Biblical Interpretation in the Early Church, ed. K. Froehlich, Sources of Early Christian Thought 5 (Philadelphia : Fortress Press, 1985), 82–94; J. M. Olivier, “Un fragment palimpseste du Commentaire de Diodore de Tarse sur les Psaumes (Vindob. Theol. Gr. X),” RHT 18 (1988): 233–41. 4. Eusebius of Emesa: DVI 91. 5. Jerome criticizes Marius Victorinus for the opposite reason. Courcelle , LLW, 119, has a more personal explanation. references Q 3, 397–401 — Dr, 267–70 — TLG 4134 — DHGE 14, 496–504, L. Abramowski — DSp 3, 986–93, G. Bardy — EEC 12 , 331–32, R. Greer — EECh 1, 236–37, M. Simonetti — LThK 33 , 238, C. Kannengiesser — NCE 4, 875, F. A. Sullivan — TRE 8, 763–67, C. Schäublin — Rebenich, 107 154 ST. JEROME ...

Share