The Organization Man

CHAPTER 16 The Fight against Genius

cHAPTER 16 The Fight against Genius SUPPOSE FOR TilE MOMENT THAT YOU WERE GIVEN THIS MENTAL EX• ercise: without knowing anything about how scientists work today, you were to imagine what would happen if the Social Ethic were applied to science as it has been in the rest of organization life. The chances are that you would imagine, among other things, that: (1) scientists would now concentrate on the practical application of previously discovered ideas rather than the discovery of new ones; (2) they would rarely work hy themselves but rather as units of scientific cells; (3) organization loyalty, getting along with people, etc. would be considered just as important as thinking; (4) wellrounded team players would be more valuable than brilliant men, and a very brilliant man would probably be disruptive. Lastly and most important, these things would be so because people believe this is the way it should be. Well? Of the $4 billion currently being spent on research and development by government, industry, and the universities, only about $150 million-or less than 4 percent-is for creative research. The overwhelming majority of people engaged in research, furthermore , must now work as supervised team players, and only a tiny fraction are in a position to do independent work. Of the 6oo,ooo people engaged in scientific work, it has been estimated that probably no more than s,ooo are free to pick their own problems. And this is because people think it should be so. In the current orgy of self-congratulation over American technical progress, it is the increasing collectivization of research that is saluted. Occasionally the individual greats of the past are saluted, but it is with a subtle twist that manages to make them seem team researchers before their time. In the popular ideology, science means applying ideas; knowing how, not asking why. 205 206 THE ORGANIZATION MAN' We have indeed been very good at applying basic ideas. It is our natural bent to be good at exploitation. It is also our natural bent to recognize too late the necessity for replenishing that which we exploit. We have never had a strong tradition of basic science in this country and now, even less than before, we do not seem to care about creating new ideas-the ideas which thirty or forty years from now would nourish the technological advances we so confidently expect. So far only a few people have had the nerve to come out flatly against the independent researcher, hut the whole tenor of organization thinking is unmistakably in that direction. Among Americans there is today a widespread conviction that science has evolved to a point where the lone man engaged in fundamental inquiry is anachronistic , if not fundamental inquiry itself. Look, we are told, how the atom bomb was brought into being by the teamwork of huge corporations of scientists and technicians. Occasionally somebody mentions in passing that what an eccentric old man with a head of white hair did hack in his study forty years ago had something to do with it. But people who concede this point are likely to say that this merely proves that basic ideas aren't the problem any more. It's nice to have ideas and all that, sure, but it's American know-how that does something with them, and anyway there are plenty of ideas lying fallow. We don't really need any more ivory-tower theorizing; what we need is more funds, more laboratory facilities, more organization. THE CASE FOR MORE FUNDAMENTAL INQUIRY HAS BEEN ARGUED SO eloquently by scientists that there is little the layman can contribute in this respect. My purpose in these next three chapters, however, is not to add an amen, though this is in order, but to demonstrate the relationship between the scientist and the management trends I have been discussing in other contexts. The parallels between the organization man and the scientist should not be drawn too closely; their functions are not alike and between the managerial outlook and the scientific there is a basic conflict in goals that is not to be smothered by optimism. I do not say this in qualification of my argument. It is my argument . For the fact is that the parallels are being drawn too closely, and in a profoundly mistaken analogy The Organization is trying The Fight against GenifJ8 201 to mold the scientist to its own image; indeed, it sees the accomplishment of this metamorphosis as the...