Notes
Notes Preface I. This censure is discussed in J. M. M. H. Thijssen, "Master Amalric and the Amalricians: Inquisitorial Procedure and the Supression ofHeresy at the University ofParis;' Speculum 71 (1996),43-65. 2. The Collection of Parisian Articles was used in the editions of Carolus Du Plessis d'Argentn~, Collectio judiciorum de novis erroribus, 3 vols. (Paris, 1724-36), and Emile Denifle and Heinrich Chatelain, Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis, 4 vols. (Paris, 1889-91). See also the survey ofthe sources at the end ofthis study. 3. See for example Etienne Gilson, Laphilosophie au moyen age; 2d ed. rev. and expo (Paris, 1947), 383-85, 558-68, 657, Julius R. Weinberg, A Short History of Medieval Philosophy (Princeton, N.J., 1964),49,171-75,235, Frederick C. Copleston ,A History ofMedieval Philosophy (London, 1972),63,155,202-9, and Michael Haren, Medieval Thought: The Western Intellectual Tradition from Antiquity to the Thirteenth Century, 2d ed. (Toronto, 1992), 194-21I. 4. See, for instance, CUP I: 73, and 199, and 3: 184 and 508. 5. Koch; Jiirgen Miethke, "Theologenprozesse in der ersten Phase ihrer institutionellen Ausbildung: Die Verfahren gegen Peter Abaelard und Gilbert von Poitiers;' Viator 6 (1975), 87-II7; Miethke, "Papst, Ortsbischofund Universitat in den Pariser Theologenprozessen des 13. Jahrhunderts;' in DieAuseinandersetzungen an der Pariser Universitiit im XIII. Jahrhundert, ed. Albert Zimmermann (Berlin, 1976), 52-95; Miethke, "Bildungsstand und Freiheitsforderung (12. bis 14. Jahrhundert );' in Die Abendliindische Freiheit vom ro. zum 14. Jahrhundert, ed. Johannes Fried (Sigmaringen, 1991), esp. 231-40; William J. Courtenay, "Inquiry and Inquisition : Academic Freedom in Medieval Universities;' CH 58 (1989),168-82; Courtenay, "The Articles Condemned at Oxford Austin Friars in 1315;' in Via Augustini: Augustine in the Later Middle Ages) Renaissance and Reformation, ed. Heiko O. Oberman and Frank A. James, III (Leiden, 1991), 5-18; Courtenay, "Dominicans and Suspect Opinion in the Thirteenth Century: The Case ofStephen of Venizy, Peter of Tarentaise, and the Articles of 1270 and 1271;' Vivarium 32 (1994), 186-95; Courtenay, "The Preservation and Dissemination of Academic Condemnations at the University of Paris in the Middle Ages;' in Les philosophies morales etpolitiques au Moyen Age, ed. B. C. Bazan, E. Andujar, L. Sbrocchi, 3 vols. (New York, Ottawa, and Toronto, 1995), 3: 1659-67, and J. M. M. H. Thijssen, ''Academic Heresy and Intellectual Freedom at the University of Paris, 1200-I 378;' Centres ofLearning in Pre-Modern Europe and the Near East, ed. Jan-Willem Drijvers and A. A. MacDonald (Leiden, 1995),217-228. Academic condemnations play 122 Notes to Pages xi-1 only a minor role in the rich study byMaryM. McLaughlin, IntelleaualFreedom and Its Limitations in the University ofParis in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries (New York, 1977), which is a reprint of a Ph.D. dissertation of 1952. See also her ''Paris Masters ofthe Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries and Ideas ofIntellectual Freedom;' CH 24 (1955), 195-21I. Shortly after the manuscript was completed in 1997, two pertinent articles were published that, unfortunately, could not be taken into account here: Luca Bianchi, "Censure, liberte et progres intellectuel al'Universite de Paris au XUle siecle;' AHDL 63 (1996),45-93 and William J. Courtenay, "Pastor de Serrescuderio (d. 1356) and MS Saint-Omer 239;' AHDL 63 (1996), 325-356. 6. For the impact of the Great Schism on the universities see Allen E. Bernstein , Pierre d'Ailly and the Blanchard Affair (Leiden, 1978), esp. 28-60, R. N. Swanson, Universities, AcademicS and the Great Schism (Cambridge, 1979), Guy Fitch Lytle, ''Universities as Religious Authorities in the Later Middle Ages and Reformation;' in Reform andAuthority in the Medieval and Reformation Church, ed. Guy Fitch Lytle (Washington, D.c., 1981),79-82; and Paolo Nardi, "Relations withAuthority;' in Universities in theMiddleAges, ed. Hilde De Ridder-Symoens (A History ofthe University in Europe, vol. I; Cambridge, 1992), 100-I 02. 7. This view is expressed in John B. Bury, History ofFreedom ofThought (London , 1913), 52 and quoted and rejected in Charles H. Haskins, TheRenaissance ofthe Twelfth Century (New York, 1962), 361. Other examples of negative views on the independence of medieval thought with regard to religion, theology, or faith, are given in Maurice de Wulf, Histoire de laphilosophic midiivale, 3 vols., 6th ed. (Louvain and Paris, 1934-47), I: lo,and 18-19. ChapterI. The Suppression ofFalse Teaching I. William Ockham, Dialogus (Opera plurima; Lyon, 1494-96; republished London, 1962), fol. lIra. Details about this work are given in Chapter 5. 2. CUP 2: 86, 141, 148, 173, 215, 243-44...
OR
