We cannot verify your location
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE

Hegel and Deleuze

Together Again for the First Time

Karen Houle and Jim Vernon

Publication Year: 2013

Published by: Northwestern University Press

Title Page, Copyright Page

pdf iconDownload PDF (101.8 KB)
pp. i-iv


pdf iconDownload PDF (61.4 KB)
pp. v-vi


pdf iconDownload PDF (87.7 KB)
pp. vii-x

read more

Introduction, Karen Houle and Jim Vernon

pdf iconDownload PDF (134.9 KB)
pp. xi-2

A century and a half separates Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel and Gilles Deleuze. It would be hard to overstate the impact of these two major European intellectuals, individually, on what has come to be called “Continental philosophy.” What has proved equally hard, however, is to determine the impact the thought of each thinker has on that of the other...

Part 1. Disjunction/Contradiction

read more

1. At the Crossroads of Philosophy and Religion: Deleuze’s Critique of Hegel

pdf iconDownload PDF (114.0 KB)
pp. 5-17

For Hegel and Deleuze both religion and philosophy are undeniable facts of human existence. Thus neither Hegel nor Deleuze can avoid an account of how religion and philosophy relate to one another. For Hegel religion and philosophy are related to one another as content and form. For Deleuze religion and philosophy are two different types of creation, which are often confused with each other but ultimately are ...

read more

2. Negation, Disjunction, and a New Theory of Forces: Deleuze’s Critique of Hegel

pdf iconDownload PDF (135.0 KB)
pp. 18-37

I would like in this chapter to examine the relationship Deleuze establishes with Hegel with a view to avoiding the false alternative often bandied between Deleuze’s critics and defenders: that either Deleuze is a naive and ill- informed reader whose polemic against his rival misunderstands how dialectical his own thinking is, or that Hegel is unimportant...

read more

3. Hegel and Deleuze: Difference or Contradiction?

pdf iconDownload PDF (121.6 KB)
pp. 38-53

In the foreword to Difference and Repetition,1 Deleuze locates his philosophical program in what he thinks is a broad current of “anti-Hegelianism,” and indicates that difference and repetition must take the place of identity, negativity, and contradiction. This programmatic statement deliberately foregrounds his theoretical quarrel with Hegelian- type dialectics,...

read more

4. The Logic of the Rhizome in the Work of Hegel and Deleuze

pdf iconDownload PDF (137.2 KB)
pp. 54-75

The aim of this chapter is to provide an account of Deleuze and Guattari’s model of the rhizome, and to look at a possible Hegelian line of response to it. After outlining why Deleuze and Guattari feel the need to move away from an arborescent model of thought, such as underlies the structure of judgment, I look at Hegel’s description of plant life in the ...

read more

5. Actualization: Enrichment and Loss

pdf iconDownload PDF (137.9 KB)
pp. 76-96

One aspect of the difference between Deleuze and Hegel which has not received suffi cient attention is their opposing views on “actualization,” the becoming actual of a potential or of what Deleuze calls “the virtual.” For Hegel, actualization is the outward manifestation and expression of a truth or reality that had only been implicit. This process of manifestation is at the same time an articulation of what had been inchoate, a determination...

read more

6. Political Bodies Without Organs: On Hegel’s Ideal State and Deleuzian Micropolitics

pdf iconDownload PDF (125.1 KB)
pp. 97-114

Deleuze’s antipathy to Hegelian dialectics is well known.1 According to Deleuze, Hegel is Nietzsche’s archenemy and Nietzsche’s pluralist theory of forces is resolutely antidialectical: “The concept of the Overman is directed against the dialectical conception of man, and transvaluation is directed against the dialectic of appropriation or the suppression of alienation. Anti-Hegelianism runs through Nietzsche’s work as its...

read more

7. Deleuze and Hegel on the Logic of Relations

pdf iconDownload PDF (122.1 KB)
pp. 115-130

As is well known, one essential weapon Deleuze employs to oppose Hegel is the thesis of the externality of relations.1 Hegel, after all, is the archetypal thinker of organic relations between systematically structured terms, and thus to escape him one must demonstrate that such putatively necessary relations are in fact only contingently applied, and thus can ...

Part 2. Connection/Synthesis

read more

8. Deleuze and Hegel on the Limits of Self-Determined Subjectivity

pdf iconDownload PDF (129.0 KB)
pp. 133-151

At the heart of Deleuze’s critique of Hegel is a contestation as to how to conceive the disenchanted world that the Enlightenment bequeathed us. The scientifi c rigor of modern philosophy reconfigured the self-world relation in a manner that for the most part made the knowing subject the arbiter of everything earthly. In the idealized narrative of modernity...

read more

9. Desiring-Production and Spirit: On Anti-Oedipus and German Idealism

pdf iconDownload PDF (149.6 KB)
pp. 152-172

In many respects, Anti- Oedipus, the collaborative work of Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, is a typical book of German idealist philosophy. Like Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel, Deleuze and Guattari model their work in Anti-Oedipus on the form of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason and then use the form of Kant’s own project to develop a critique of Kant. I will ...

read more

10. Hegel and Deleuze: The Storm

pdf iconDownload PDF (107.5 KB)
pp. 173-182

According to Deleuze, Hegelian contradiction is nothing but a false appearance which does not even resemble difference. According to this interpretation, the dialectic is completely governed by the privileged position it bestows on identity: there is contradiction only in light of this principle. Difference is judged from the start with reference to the calm reign of identity, and is thereby barred from ever truly sojourning in...

read more

11. Limit, Ground, Judgment . . . Syllogism: Hegel, Deleuze, Hegel, and Deleuze

pdf iconDownload PDF (148.8 KB)
pp. 183-203

Deleuze’s longest discussion of Hegel, the fi fteen- page passage in Difference and Repetition, chapter 1, 61–76/42–54,1 is (until the end of it) his most positive. What interests me is not his criticisms of Hegel, but the way Deleuze forces Hegel’s dialectic into more becoming, and Hegel forces Deleuze’s differences into more history. Deleuze discusses three themes in Hegel’s logic: limit and the infinite; contradiction and ground; ...

read more

12. Hegel and Deleuze on Life, Sense, and Limit

pdf iconDownload PDF (141.6 KB)
pp. 204-220

In this chapter I draw Hegel and Deleuze into slightly closer proximity than either Deleuze or most scholarship on Deleuze (or Hegel) might admit. I take up Alexandre Kojève’s1 and Andrzej Warminski’s2 semiotic readings of Hegel and then contrast these with Deleuze. This contrast is warranted since, against semiotics, Deleuze locates the sign and sense outside of consciousness, and in the fold of Life. Deleuze reverses the...

Part 3. Conjunctive Synthesis

read more

13. A Criminal Intrigue: An Interview with Jean-Clet Martin

pdf iconDownload PDF (186.1 KB)
pp. 223-252

In the “Postface to the Anglo-American Edition” of his Variations, Jean- Clet Martin surprised his readers with the announcement of a new book on Hegel. “I begin to feel,” he wrote, “the need for a book on the Phenomenology of the Spirit, where the enemy will fi nd a better place in the network of friendships, introduced by Deleuze in What Is Philosophy?, than he has found in the smiles of the most ardent disciples. In this book,...


pdf iconDownload PDF (109.8 KB)
pp. 253-255

E-ISBN-13: 9780810166530
Print-ISBN-13: 9780810128972

Page Count: 248
Publication Year: 2013

Edition: New
Volume Title: 1

Research Areas


UPCC logo

Subject Headings

  • Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, 1770-1831.
  • Deleuze, Gilles, 1925-1995.
  • Philosophy, Modern.
  • You have access to this content
  • Free sample
  • Open Access
  • Restricted Access