In this Book

summary
For some, he was "America's leading smut king," hauled into court repeatedly over thirty years for peddling obscene publications through the mail. But when Samuel Roth appealed a 1956 conviction, he forced the Supreme Court to finally come to grips with a problem that had plagued both American society and constitutional law for longer than he had been in business. For while the facts of Roth v. United States were unexceptional, its constitutional issues would define the relationship of obscenity to the First Amendment.

The Supreme Court's 6-3 decision in Roth for the first time tried to definitively rule on the issue of obscenity in American life and law—and failed. In this first book-length examination of the case, Whitney Strub lays out the history of obscenity's meaning as a legal concept, highlights the influence of antivice crusaders like Anthony Comstock and John Sumner, and chronicles the shadowy career that led Roth to spend nearly a decade of his life imprisoned for the allegedly obscene materials that he sent through the mails. Strub then unwraps the events that produced Roth v. United States, placing the trial in the context of its times—the Kinsey Reports, the Kefauver hearings, free speech debates—by using Roth's own private papers along with the records of the various prosecutions and the memos of the justices.

The significance of Roth, as Strub reveals, lay in the two faces of Justice William Brennan's majority opinion--which on the one hand reflected the liberalizing attitude toward sexual matters in mid-century America, but on the other kept "obscene" expressions beyond First Amendment protection. Because that ruling points up the contradictions of a society where the prurient and repressive commingle uncomfortably, Strub shows how Roth says much more about American sexual values than Brennan's written words necessarily acknowledged.

In our era of internet pornography and Fifty Shades of Grey, it may be difficult to imagine a time when obscenity was a matter for the courts. As Strub tracks the legacy of Roth and obscenity law through the ongoing policing of acceptable sexuality into the twenty-first century, his riveting narrative brings those times to life and helps readers navigate the fine line between what is socially acceptable and what is criminally obscene.

Table of Contents

restricted access Download Full Book
  1. Cover
  2. p. 1
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Title Page, About the Series, Other Works in the Series, Copyright
  2. pp. 2-5
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Contents
  2. pp. 6-7
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Editors’ Preface
  2. pp. vii-viii
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Acknowledgments
  2. pp. ix-xii
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Introduction
  2. pp. 1-4
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chapter 1. Toward Obscenity: Legal Evolution from Colonies to Comstock
  2. pp. 5-26
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chapter 2. Modernizing Free Speech: Politics, Sex, and the First Amendment in the Early Twentieth Century
  2. pp. 27-48
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chapter 3. Samuel Roth, From Art to Smut
  2. pp. 49-70
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chapter 4. The Absent Supreme Court: Obscenity Doctrine in the 1940s
  2. pp. 71-104
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chapter 5. Cold War, Hot Lust: Sexual Politics in the 1950s
  2. pp. 105-137
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chapter 6. Anatomy of a Case
  2. pp. 138-160
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chapter 7. Writing Roth: The Court Opines
  2. pp. 161-182
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chapter 8. The Two Roths: Liberalization, Regulation, and the Apparent Paradox of Obscenity in the 1960s
  2. pp. 183-200
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chapter 9. From Porno Chic to New Critiques: Conservatives, Feminists, and Backlash to Obscenity
  2. pp. 201-222
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Epilogue: After Obscenity?
  2. pp. 223-230
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Major Cases Cited
  2. pp. 231-232
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chronology
  2. pp. 233-236
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Bibliographical Essay
  2. pp. 237-248
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Index
  2. pp. 249-268
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Back Cover
  2. p. 282
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.