-
CHAPTER 3: Perceptions of the Parties and Candidates
- University of Michigan Press
- Chapter
- Additional Information
31 CHAPTER 3 Perceptions of the Parties and Candidates Voterscasttheirballotsinsecr etbutnotinthedar k.Tounderstanda voter’schoice,wemustcometogripswiththewayavoterseestheelements thatenterintothedecision.Foremostamongthemarethecandidates ontheballot, thepar tiesthe yrepresent,andtheissueson whichthepar tiesandcandidat esmaytakedifferentpositions.Like Plato’scave-dwellers,somevotersglimpseonlyflickeringshadowsof theseobjects,especiallyif theyarecomplicatedissuesof policy.Regardless ofhowdistortedtheseperceptionsmaybe,thedecisiontocast acertainvote—ornottovoteatall—makessenseonlyintermsofthe subjectiveimprintofthepoliticalw orldinthecitiz en’smind.Webelieve thatelectoralchoiceisguidedbyasimplepremise:Whateverdoes notregisterinav oter’smindcannotmak eadifferenceinthev oter’s behavior. Ifav oter’selectoralchoiceisguidedb ya“cognitivemap,”touse Hyman’sfamousphrase,thisisnotanobjectivedrawingofthepolitical world.Infact,itisanaffecti velycoloredmap.Votersareguidednotb y accurateperceptionsofcandidates(accurateinsomeag reed-onsense), butbyevaluations ofthecandidatesinpositiveornegativeterms.One citizen’sevaluationmaysharplydifferfromanother’s.Whatonevoter seesasdecisivenessinacandidate,anothervoterseesasrashness.Eachof thesesubjectiveassessmentsisrealtothepersonwhomakesit.Ofcritical importanceforbehavior,thepositivelytonedperceptionislikelyto motivateavoteforthecandidatesoperceived,whilethenegativelytoned perceptiondoessofortheo pponent.Moreover,ashiftof theaffective balanceofsuchperceptionsovertimehelpse xplainthed ynamicsof electoralchange. the influence of historical reality Despitethesubjectivityofassessments,individualsdonothaveunlimited leewaytoconstructtheirownimageofthepoliticalworld.Some factsar edifficult oint erpretindiffer entways.P rofoundhist orical eventssuchasec onomicdepressions,wars,domesticupheavals,and majorscandalsareboundtoleavesimilarimpressionsinthegener al public.Asthesalientfactsc hange,therefore,generalperceptionsmove alongwiththem.Forthisreason,onecannotaccountforcommonimages ofpartiesandtheircandidateswithoutrecognizingtheinfluen eof thefl wofhistoricalreality. Thischapterfocusesontheimpactof changesinthepoliticalen vironment onperceptionsofpartiesandcandidates.Indoingsoweshould notlosesightofthedistinctionbetw eenimageandr eality.Thetwoare notthesame.Thetranslationfromonetotheotherisnotaut omaticor identicalforallmembersof themasspublic.Itisworthremindingourselves thatpoliticalrealitycaninfluen evotersatthepollsonlybygetting intotheirmindandundertheirskin. Thus,wehavetopayattentionto psychologicalprocessesofcognitionandaffect. Giventheimportanceofperceptionsinmotivatingbehavior,itis imperativetolearnhowchangesinther ealworldofpoliticsalterthe voters’cognitivemapofthatworld.Thisinsightwillleadusalongway towardanunderstandingofthechangingfortunesofthepoliticalparties innationalelections.Togaugetheimagesofcandidatesandparties heldbytheAmericanelectorate,weturntodatathatha vebeencollected byaskingrespondentswhattheylikeordislikeaboutthoseindividuals andinstitutions. Beforeexploringresponsestothosequestions, letusnot eseveral limitationsofthisanalysis.Givenourfocusonthetwomostrecentpresidential elections,weareconsideringonlyashorttimehorizon.Observations fromtwonationalsur veysspanningafour -yearintervalmay makeastrongcasefortheeffectof historicalrealityonimages,butwill fallshortofdefinit veproof.Inparticular,historicaleventsmayhavedetermined popularimageslongbeforetheperiodinwhichoursurveys askedaboutperceptions.Itremainsamatterofinferencetotracethe imprintof paste ventsinthec ontentandt enorof imagesr ecorded 32 ★ the american voter revisited [3.140.242.165] Project MUSE (2024-04-23 19:40 GMT) 1.Forthispurpose,astandard...