In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Index Ability, 57, 61 Abolitionism, 46, 53 Abortion, 16-17, 141n.5, 142-43, 148-49,153-59,161-62 Acker, Kathy, 125-26 Act of Congress (1855), 15 Act of Congress (1907), 15,87-88, 89-90 Adenauer, Conrad, 40 Advertising, 116 Affirmative action, 51-53, 55-56, 61, 63-66 African Americans, 50-65. See also Race; Racism Agency-based models, 36-37, 51-52, 67-68,71 Althusser, Louis, 32 Alvarez, Jorge, 25-26 American Revolution, 81 Amnesia, 46. See also Memory Amnesties, 38, 39-41, 46, 50 Annals ofCongress, 84 Antimiscegenation laws, 78, 87 Apartheid, 4, 66, 68 Arizona, 86 Armageddon, 33 Authoritarianism, 44, 46, 49, 74 Autonomy rights, 155-57, 163n.63 Balkin, Jack, 8 Barnett, Randy E., 9n.41 Basic Law, 46, 50 Bataille, Georges, 30 Benjamin, Walter, 13, 19-20, 24, 29-31,33 Berghahn, Volker, 48 Bill of Rights, 139, 143 Bismarck, Otto von, 50 Bitburg Cemetery, 70 Black, Charles, 68 Blackstone Rangers, 22 Blatch, Harriot Stanton, 89 Brandeis, Louis, 123, 133 Bright, Susie, 113, 117-18 Britain, 81, 83n.12 Broad-agency models, 14, 36, 54-56, 65 Brown v. Board ofEducation, 51, 53-54, 63,65,68 Busing, 63-64 Butler, Judy, 129 Cable, John, 90 Cable Act of 1922, 90-94, 96 Caillois, Roger, 30 California, 88, 86 Canada, 84 Capitalism, 74 Capital punishment, 29-30, 121 Caputi, Jane, lo4n.17, 116n.56 Caste systems, 54. See also Class Center-Right thesis, 59-60 Chicago, 23-24, 60. See also Illinois Children, and immigration law, 81, 83n.12 Chile, 38, 40 China, 77-78,84-87,91-93,95-96 Chinese Exclusion Acts, 86 Chomsky, Noam, 102 Christianity, 50 168 CIA (Central Intelligence Agency), 19 Citizenship, 15,53, 77-97; as indelible , 81; and judicial supremacy, 143. See also Immigration law Civil Rights Act of 1964, 51-52 Civil rights movement, 51-65 Civil War: claims of free slaves after, 37,41-42,58; naturalization policy after, 84; reconstruction after, 14, 35-37,41-42,45-46,58 Class: middle class, 43-44, 49,61,66, 75; planter class, 42; and racial distinctions , 62-73; subordination of women as a, 117-18; working class, 44, 66. See also Caste systems Class actions, 36 Coetzee, J. M., 19 Cohen, Joshua, 16, 99-137 Colombia, 27 Color blindness, 51-52, 54, 57, 59, 63, 65,68 Common law, 81, 83, 87 Communicative ethics, 5 Communism: and epochal injustices, 35,37-39,47,69, 71, 73; and lawfounding violence, 31. See also Marxism Communist Party, 37, 71, 73 Compensation, for injustices, 5-6, 37-38,40,55,69-70 Congress, 42, 47; Act of Congress (1855), 15; Act of Congress (1907), 15,87-88,89-90; Chinese Exclusion Acts, 86; Civil Rights Act of 1964, 51-52; and equal opportunity, goal of, 62; Expatriation Act of 1868, 89; House Judiciary Committee, 55-56; and immigration law, 81, 83-84, 87-88,9o-g1,94-96;~cCarran­ Walter Act, 96; Quota Act of 1921, 91, 95; Wagner Act, 60 Consequentialism,17 Constitution, 78, 139-43; Bill of Rights, 139, 143; and color blindness , 52; Equal Rights Amendment, 96; First Amendment, 101-2, 114, INDEX 134-35; Fourteenth Amendment, 84, 93n·37, 95; and immigration law, 78, 83-84, 93n.37, 95; and judicial supremacy, 139-63; Thirteeth Amendment, 84 Constitutionalism, 140 Context, importance of, 15 CORE, 55 Corrective justice model, 39, 40 Corruption, and policing, 20, 26, 33-34 Cott, Nancy F., 15,77-97 Coulmas, Corinna, 74 Coverture, common-law doctrine of, 83,87 Curtis, Dennis, 7 Czechoslovakia, 37 Das, ~ary K., 77, 93-94 Das, Taraknath, 77, 94 Death penalty, 29-30, 121 Declaration of Independence, 52 Deliberative interests, 16, 124, 126 Democracy, 19, 80; in Chile, 38; and epochal injustices, 38, 42-44, 46, 48-49; and judicial supremacy, 149-51, 153, 161; parliamentary, 44 Denazification, 44-45, 47-50 , 71-72 De Palma, Brian, 116 Derrida, Jacques, I, 7 Despair, 14, 21 Distributive justice, 5, 9, 12 Diversity, goal of, 55 Douglass, Frederick, 52 Doux commerce thesis, 49 Douzinas, Costas, 3-4, 7 Dworkin, Andrea, 16, 99-102 Dworkin, Ronald, 17, 141, 143-45, 147-64 Eastern Europe, 35, 69, 71n·59, 75 East Germany, 14, 37, 38, 69, 73 Eastman, Crystal, 89 Education, 61, 64-68, 70; and Brown v. Board ofEducation, 51-54, 63, 65, 68; in Germany, 46-47, 50; and racial discrimination, 51-54,60,63,65,68 [3.12.71.237] Project MUSE (2024...

Share