In this Book

  • A Good Quarrel: America's Top Legal Reporters Share Stories from Inside the Supreme Court
  • Book
  • Timothy R. Johnson and Jerry Goldman, Editors
  • 2009
  • Published by: University of Michigan Press
buy this book Buy This Book in Print
summary

While reading what top legal reporters say about some of the most important U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in recent history, go to this website to listen to audio and hear for yourself the very style and delivery of the oral arguments that have shaped the history of our nation's highest law. See Preface for full instructions.

Contributors

  • Charles Bierbauer, CNN
  • Lyle Denniston, scotusblog.com
  • Fred Graham, Court TV
  • Brent Kendall, Los Angeles Daily Journal
  • Steve Lash, Houston Chronicle
  • Dahlia Lithwick, Slate.com
  • Tony Mauro, American Lawyer Media
  • Tim O'Brien, ABC News
  • David Savage, Los Angeles Times
  • Greg Stohr, Bloomberg News
  • Nina Totenberg, NPR

Timothy R. Johnson teaches in the Department of Political Science and the Law School at the University of Minnesota.

Jerry Goldman teaches political science at Northwestern University and directs the OYEZ Project, a multimedia archive devoted to the Supreme Court, at www.oyez.org.

Cover sketch by Dana Verkouteren

"Supreme Court oral arguments are good government in action. A Good Quarrel brilliantly showcases this important aspect of the Court's work."
---Paul Clement, Partner, King & Spalding, and former United States Solicitor General

"Few legal experiences are as exhilarating as a Supreme Court oral argument---a unique art form that this superb collection brings vividly to life."
---Kathleen Sullivan, Partner, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver and Hedges, and former Dean, Stanford Law School

"[A Good Quarrel] shines a brilliant spotlight on the pivotal moment of advocacy when the Supreme Court confronts the nation's most profound legal questions."
---Thomas C. Goldstein, Partner, Akin Gump, and Lecturer, Supreme Court Litigation, Harvard Law School and Stanford Law School

"A brilliant way to understand America's most important mysterious institution."
---Lawrence Lessig, Stanford Law School

Table of Contents

restricted access Download Full Book
  1. Cover
  2. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Front Matter
  2. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Foreword
  2. pp. vii-x
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Contents
  2. pp. xi-xii
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Preface
  2. pp. xiii-xvi
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Introduction: The Role of Oral Arguments in the Supreme Court
  2. pp. 1-10
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Elk Grove Uni‹ed School District v. Newdow: Ten Commandments of Oral Arguments
  2. pp. 11-19
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Forsyth County, Georgia v. the Nationalist Movement: A Workman-like Performance
  2. pp. 20-41
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania v. Casey: The Rhetorical Battle over Roe
  2. pp. 42-60
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Bush v. Gore: Preparing for Oral Combat—the Fight for the Presidency
  2. pp. 61-73
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Glickman v. Wileman Brothers and Elliott Inc.: How Oral Arguments Led to a Lawsuit
  2. pp. 74-97
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Grutter v. Bollinger: An Argument for the Ages
  2. pp. 98-109
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Chandler v. Miller: Double Indemnity
  2. pp. 110-124
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Rapanos v. United States: Wading into the Wetlands
  2. pp. 125-144
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Randall v. Sorrell: Arguing over Campaign Finance in Vermont
  2. pp. 145-157
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. UAAAIWA v. Johnson Controls Inc.: Fighting for Women’s Rights in the Workplace
  2. pp. 158-168
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Time Inc. v. Hill: A Future President Makes His Case
  2. pp. 169-178
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Acknowledgments
  2. pp. 179-180
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Works Cited
  2. pp. 181-184
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Contributors
  2. pp. 185-188
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
  1. Index
  2. pp. 189-195
  3. restricted access
    • Download PDF Download
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.