In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

BIBLIOGRAPHY Abamo, A. P. 1992. Credit Utilization and Its Impact on Farm Productivity in Chiang Mai Province. Chiang Mai:Agricultural Systems, Chiang Mai University. Adeel, Z., Monthip Tabucanon,Yuwaree In-na, Mattana Thanomphan, Gullaya Wattayakorn, K. Tsukamoto, and Suphat Vongvisessomjai. 2002. Capacity Development Needs in the Chao Phraya River Basin and the Gulf of Thailand . Tokyo: United Nations University. AgHealthNews. 2002. Chemical exposure alarmingly high in Thailand’s Hmong farmers. AgHealthNews, no. 2002–04. http://agcenter.ucdavis.edu/Newsltr /OLN200204.html#05 (accessed 14 April 2005). Agrawal, A. 1995. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge . Development and Change 26:413–39. ———. 2005. Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. Agrawal, A., and C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development 27 (4): 629–49. Aguettant, J. L. 1996. Impact of population registration on hilltribe development in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Population Journal 11 (4): 47–72. Alford, D. 1992. Streamflow and sediment transport from mountain watersheds of the Chao Phraya Basin, northern Thailand: A reconnaissance study. Mountain Research and Development 12 (3): 237–68. Ammar Siamwalla, Suthad Setboonsarng, and Direk Patamasiriwat. 1991. Thai Agriculture: Resources, Institutions and Policies. Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute Foundation. Anak Pattanavibool and P. Dearden. 2002. Fragmentation and wildlife in montane evergreen forests, northernThailand. Biological Conservation 107 (2): 155–64. Anan Ganjanapan. 1997. The politics of environment in northern Thailand: Eth257 nicity and highland development programs. In Seeing Forests for Trees: Environment and Environmentalism in Thailand, ed. Philip Hirsch. Chiang Mai: Silkworm Books. ———. 1999.Will the community forest law strengthen management of community forests? In 3 Decades of Community Forestry: In the Midst of Confusion of Thai Society [in Thai]. Chiang Mai: Northern Development Foundation. ———. 2000. Local Control of Land and Forest: Cultural Dimensions of Resource Management in Northern Thailand. Chiang Mai: Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development, Faculty of Social Sciences, Chiang Mai University. ———. 2001. The Community Dimension: Local Thinking about Rights Power and Resource Management [in Thai]. Bangkok: Thai Research Fund. Anat Arbhabhirama, D. Phantumvanit, J. Elkington, and P. Ingkawusan. 1987. Thailand Natural Resources Profile: Is the Resource Base forThailand’s Development Sustainable? Bangkok: Thailand Development Research Institute. Anchalee Kongrut. 2003. Contamination: Soil studies of watershed areas to be made. Bangkok Post, 1 June. Anecksamphant, C., S. Boonchee, P. Inthapan, U. Tejajai, and A. Sajjapongse. 1995. The management of sloping lands for sustainable agriculture in northern Thailand. In ASIALANDS: The management of sloping lands for sustainable agriculture in Asia (Phase II) 1992–1994,ibsram Network Document Number 12, ed. A. Sajjapongse and C. R. Elliot. Bangkok: International Board for Soil Research and Management. Anonymous. 2003. Ajahn Phongsak Techadhammo and his forest conservation movement. Manuscript. Anonymous. N.d. Draft Community Forest Laws: Differences between the People’s Version and the Government Versions [in Thai]. Anurak Wangpattana. 1995. “Development”: Propaganda, promises, lies and profit. Watershed 1 (1): 10–29. Apffel-Marglin, F., and S. A. Marglin. 1990. Dominating Knowledge: Development , Culture, and Resistance. Oxford: Clarendon. Apinyaa Tanthawiwong. 2001. Summary of the important content from the 6 case studies. In The Cultural Dimension in the Era of the Sufficiency Economy [in Thai], ed. Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre. Bangkok: Princess Maha Chakri Sirindhorn Anthropology Centre. Aranya Siriphon. 2006. Local knowledge, dynamism and the politics of struggle : A case study of the Hmong in northern Thailand. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 37 (1): 65–81. ASB (Alternatives to Slash-and-Burn). 2004. Alternatives to Slash and Burn: Policy Brief January 2004. Edited by T. Tomich. Nairobi: ASB, International Centre for Research in Agroforestry. 258 Bibliography [18.224.67.149] Project MUSE (2024-04-16 10:09 GMT) Atchara Rakyutithaam. 1998. Chom Thong: When highlanders are “the accused.” In Concealed Murder on the Path to Conservation [in Thai], ed. Prayong Doklamyai , Suebsagul Kijanugorn, Prisana Pornmama, Waraalak Ithiphonolarn, Decho Chaitap, Nanta Benjasilarak, Atchara Rakyuthithaam, and Jetpa Chotgitpiwaat. Chiang Mai: Northern Development Foundation. Aylward, B. 2000. Economic analysis of land-use change in a watershed context. Paper read at UNESCO Symposium/Workshop on Forest-Water-People in the Humid Tropics, 31 July–4 August, Kuala Lumpur. Bandith Tansiri, Thirayut Citjamnong, and Daranee Srisong. 1993. Land Use Plan for the Highland Areas of Chiang Mai Province [inThai]. Bangkok: Land Development Department. Bangkok Post. 1987. Tribesmen forced back into Burma. Bangkok Post, 26 September. ———. 1989a. Editorial: Welcome reprieve for nation’s forests. Bangkok Post, 12 January. ———. 1989b...

Share