We cannot verify your location
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE
OR
title

Corporate Crops

Biotechnology, Agriculture, and the Struggle for Control

By Gabriela Pechlaner

Publication Year: 2012

Published by: University of Texas Press

Title Page, Copyright

pdf iconDownload PDF (63.2 KB)
 

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF (46.1 KB)
pp. v-vi

List of Acronyms

pdf iconDownload PDF (51.2 KB)
pp. vii-x

read more

Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF (100.6 KB)
pp. 1-13

In 1996, the first genetically modified crops were commercialized in North America. Adoption of these crops was subsequently rapid in both Canada and the United States, as was the proliferation of related litigation. Just two years later, in August of 1998, the Monsanto Company brought legal action ...

read more

1. Agricultural Biotechnologies on the Farm and around the World

pdf iconDownload PDF (173.6 KB)
pp. 14-45

While agricultural biotechnologies have brought a significant number of changes to agricultural production, such technologically induced change is not new to agriculture, of course, and is well documented in scholarly literature. Biotechnologies’ proprietary aspects add a new component to such change, ...

read more

2. The Coming of the Third Regime? Agricultural Biotechnology Regulationin Canada and the United States

pdf iconDownload PDF (168.7 KB)
pp. 46-75

As noted in the previous chapter, Canada and the United States are the only industrialized countries with significant GM crop area (51% of global area). Outside of these, the majority of biotechnology production area is in developing countries (48% of global area), most notably Brazil, Argentina, and India. ...

read more

3. Biotechnology on the Prairies:The Rise of Canola . . .

pdf iconDownload PDF (142.6 KB)
pp. 76-101

Bordered by Manitoba on the east and Alberta on the west, Saskatchewan is at the heart of Canada’s prairie region. The province occupies 161 million acres and has a population of almost 1 million (Government of Saskatchewan, “About”). The urban centers and the majority of Saskatchewan’s population live in the prairie southern half of the province. ...

read more

4. . . . And the Fall of Wheat

pdf iconDownload PDF (135.7 KB)
pp. 102-126

While resistance to biotechnologies from local Saskatchewan environmental groups is low, it has pushed forth in other avenues. In addition to the resistance raised by those supportive of Schmeiser, biotechnologies have garnered sector-specific resistance from organic producers (opposed to GM crops in general) ...

read more

5. Legal Offense and Defense on the Canadian Prairies

pdf iconDownload PDF (228.7 KB)
pp. 127-171

As we saw in Saskatchewan, biotechnologies have technological novelty; they also introduce a host of new ownership and control issues to be contended with at the farm level. Both Percy Schmeiser and the organic farmers have gone far to publicize the legal issues that accompany their introduction. ...

read more

6. From When Cotton Was King to King Monsanto

pdf iconDownload PDF (170.8 KB)
pp. 172-205

The United States is the leader in biotechnology with respect to its early experience, its GM-dedicated acres, and its extent of adoption in key agricultural crops such as soybeans and cotton; as a whole, it is indisputably pro-biotechnology. There is considerable differentiation within it, however, given its immense geographic and cultural domain. ...

read more

7. Starting a New Regime: Training the Locals

pdf iconDownload PDF (176.7 KB)
pp. 206-237

In the preceding chapter, we saw that the motivation for adopting GM technologies in Mississippi is strong. Whether due to the technologies’ merits, the risk of chemical drift, or the perceived relative disadvantage of competing with those who do adopt, there are very few who choose not to use GM cotton, soybeans, and, increasingly, corn. ...

read more

8. Conclusion

pdf iconDownload PDF (84.0 KB)
pp. 238-246

Patents were created for the mutual benefit of inventors and society more broadly: through the incentive of monopoly control, they stimulate innovation, research, and development. It is a quid pro quo relationship: at the end of the patent’s term, the benefits of the invention are available for the common good. ...

Appendix: Log of Interviews

pdf iconDownload PDF (48.0 KB)
pp. 247-250

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF (75.8 KB)
pp. 251-258

Bibliography

pdf iconDownload PDF (143.3 KB)
pp. 259-276

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF (97.5 KB)
pp. 277-289


E-ISBN-13: 9780292739468
E-ISBN-10: 029273946X
Print-ISBN-13: 9780292739451
Print-ISBN-10: 0292739451

Publication Year: 2012

Research Areas

Recommend

Subject Headings

  • Monsanto Company -- Trials, litigation, etc.
  • Agricultural biotechnology -- United States.
  • Agricultural biotechnology -- Canada.
  • Plant biotechnology -- United States.
  • Plant biotechnology -- Canada.
  • Transgenic plants -- United States.
  • Transgenic plants -- Canada.
  • Intellectual property -- United States.
  • Intellectual property -- Canada.
  • Family farms -- United States.
  • Family farms -- Canada.
  • Agricultural biotechnology -- Law and legislation -- United States.
  • Agricultural biotechnology -- Law and legislation -- Canada.
  • Plant biotechnology -- Law and legislation -- United States.
  • Plant biotechnology -- Law and legislation -- Canada.
  • You have access to this content
  • Free sample
  • Open Access
  • Restricted Access