In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

3.1 Demographic analysis of the ACP 42 4.1 Online deliberation participation statistics 58 5.1 Narrative arc of deliberative process 66 7.1 Ratings of deliberative quality 99 7.2 Average observer ratings of the ACP on Days 2–3 102 7.3 Citizen Parliamentarians’ self-assessments of democratic deliberation at the ACP 103 9.1 Distribution of the Index of Speaking Inequality (ISI) for an array of small discussion groups 123 9.2 The frequency of speaking turns in a low-equality group on Day 1 of the ACP 126 9.3 The frequency of speaking turns in the most equal group on Day 3 of the ACP 126 11.1 Match between final topic dictionaries and full-page Online Parliament proposals, plus dictionary weighting calculations 151 11.2 Comparison of the proposal ideas rated highest overall at the ACP and their corresponding category frequency in the ACP table discussions 154 12.1 Regression equations estimating the difference in policy weighting scores for Citizen Parliamentarians 167–68 14.1 The frequency and percentage of each variable and its category 196 15.1 Pre-ACP and final recommendations from Citizen Parliamentarians 207 17.1 Self-reported changes in political and deliberative attitudes after participating in ACP or Online Parliament 240 17.2 Self-reported changes in political and deliberative behavior after participating in ACP or Online Parliament 242 TABLES ...

Share