-
Back Cover
- Penn State University Press
- Chapter
- Additional Information
Conscience,onceacoreconceptforethics,has mostlydisappearedfrommodernmoraltheory. In this book Douglas Langston traces its intellectualhistorytoaccountforitsneglect whilearguingforitsstillvitalimportance,if correctlyunderstood. Inmedievaltimes,LangstonshowsinPartI, thenotionsofconscientia andsynderesis,from whichourcontemporaryconceptofconscience derives,werecloselyconnectedtoGreekideas aboutthevirtuesandpracticalreason,albeit inChristianizedform.Asmodifi edbyLuther, Butler, and Kant, however, conscience later cametoberegardedasafacultylikewilland intellect, and when faculty psychology fell intodisrepute,sodidtheroleofconscience inmoralphilosophy. A view of mature conscience that sees it as relational, with cognitive, emotional, and conative dimensions, can survive the criticisms of conscience as faculty, and in PartIIthroughdiscussionsofFreud,Ryle,and othermodernthinkersLangstonproceedsto reconstructconscienceasaviablephilosophical concept. Finally, in Part III, this better grounded conceptisconnectedwiththemodernrevival of virtue ethics, and Langston shows how crucial conscience is to a theory of virtue becauseitisfundamentaltothetrainingof anymorallygoodperson. ............................... Douglas C. Langston is Professor ofPhilosophyandReligionatNew CollegeoftheUniversityofSouth Florida. His previous book, God’s Willing Knowledge,waspublishedby PennStatePressin1986. ................ C O N S C I E N C E a n d O T H E R VIRTUES D O U G L A S C . L A N G S T O N THEPENNSYLVANIASTATEUNIVERSITYPRESS UniversityPark,Pennsylvaniawww.psu.edu/psupress ISBN0-271-02070-9 ISBN0-271-02070-9 ,!7IA2H1-acahaj!:t;K;k;K;k PENN STATE PRESS L A N G S T O N ....... conscienceandother other virtues H i s t o r y / P h i l o s o p h y / R e l i g i o n Thisimportantbooksynthesizesabroadrangeofhistoricaland contemporary literature dealing with conscience. It traces the developmentofthenotionofconscienceintheWesternphilosophical traditionfromantiquitythroughtheearlymodernperiod,andit rehabilitatesconscienceasauseful,evencrucial,conceptforcurrent ethicaltheory.” — M i c h a e l G . B a y l o r “ ...