In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

xiii This book is designed to provide new insights into the first battle between the largest fighting machines of the early twentieth century. It seeks the reasons for the battle in the context of what was basically a stalemate on the ground in the opening phases of World War I. The ships involved were novel, powerful, and regarded as national assets that were not to be risked lightly, but which could be gambled in an attempt to even the odds for the battle fleets for which they scouted. The prestige and competence of Imperial Germany and the British Empire were at issue. Efforts of the previous twenty years and the investments of hundreds of millions in gold were at risk. Dogger Bank involved dozens ofshipsanditwasalarge,cold,anddesperatebattle,butitwasbothnovel and a precedent for engagements to come. It is instructive to understand the roles which time and distance played in the North Sea Theater. To this event, the Germans have left posterity with a remarkable little chart showing the distance in Seemeilen , or nautical miles (2,000 yards or 6,000 feet instead of 5,280 feet on land),betweenallthekeypointsonthechart.Thisenablesustoviewthe problems faced by the combatants both in time and distance. The North Sea is shallow and treacherous, providing a challenge to simple navigation , much less naval warfare. It is hostage to incredibly foul dangerous weather and low visibility which affected both combatants throughout the war. It is not possible or wise to ignore the role of the other half of the geography of the north German Coast–the Baltic. Germany faced the prospect of a naval campaign against Russia during the First World War.ThesubordinationoftheRussiannavy,liketheGerman,totheland Preface xiv Preface campaign, and the lack of coordination or imagination on their part for most of the war, despite Russia having significant resources, meant that the Germans did not have to concern themselves with Russian initiatives . They could resort to a purely defensive strategy, which retained Balticsea-lanesforGermanuse,especiallysupportofGermanrawmaterialimportsforherwarindustriesfromSweden ,throughouttheconflict. To a great extent however, the Germans were able to deter an active Russian fleet policy which might have contested control of the Baltic and opened the German North Sea coast to a Russian amphibious assault –BerlinwasonlyninetymilesfromtheBalticlittoral.TheGermans were able to do this because of the Kiel Canal, which would allow transfer of the High Seas Fleet from the North Sea to the Baltic, or the other direction, in a matter of a day. There was always danger from mines, and later from British submarines, but no British Baltic operation was ever attempted. The Baltic was always relevant to German sea power, as this map shows, but it was never operationally decisive, except to prolong Germany’s ability to conduct the land war on two fronts and to deny victory to the Russians. The map in figure A.1 illustrates some basic numbers. From the German main naval bases in the Jade River around Cuxhaven, the distances were: to Scapa Flow–490 nm (the principal Grand Fleet base); to the Firth of Forth–470 nm (the normal British Battle Cruiser Base, and sometimestheGrandFleetlocus);toHull–310nm(andmosttargetson the British east coast); to the Thames–340 nm; to Dover–290 nm; to Portsmouth–400 nm (main British naval base and repair facility). Distances of this magnitude, involving strategic operations either strictly naval or amphibious, would involve planning and logistics on scales unprecedented, but not impossible. The real issue was how to win the war and impose the will of either side by force. The British knew they would eventually win a war of distant blockade with little risk; but they could not know the cost in time or lives while the generals and politicians gambled on other fronts. Fisher and Churchill’s Baltic ideas were not such chimeras as they have appeared. A battle which deprived the Germans of any significant portion of their fleet would alter the calculus for success or failure in the Baltic, thus potentially upsetting what was [3.144.151.106] Project MUSE (2024-04-25 13:39 GMT) Preface xv for the German army a front that, as long as it was guarded by the navy, contained no risk or threat, but for which there was no reserve or effectivedefense .TherisksintheactionswhichresultedinDoggerBankthus contained danger not heretofore obvious. The first battle between dreadnoughts took place on 24 January 1915 in the southeastern North Sea. The Germans were frustrated because the British, who possessed what Clausewitzian strategists called “brutal superiority,” were supposed to attack.1 Because of this mind-set, and the “vaunted...

Share