In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

two Sexual violence, Sacrifice, and narratives of Political origins RoBin May Schott In the present era, we have become familiar with the coupling of sexual violence and political conflicts. When Serbian paramilitary soldiers committed mass rapes against Bosnian Muslims during the wars in the 1990s, it was part of a project of Serbian nation building. And when Hutus raped a quarter-million Tutsi women during the genocide in Rwanda, the violence was also fed by a passion to “sanitize” the country from Tutsi (Power 2002: 334). In both of these recent genocides, sexual violence was used as a tool for a perverted form of nation building.In the history of political narratives, one also finds ample evidence of the coupling of sexual violence with the founding of a new kind of political community.For example,the story of the rape of Lucretia portrays her rape and subsequent suicide as motivating the overthrow of tyranny and the introduction of republican rule in Rome. Why do some narratives portray sexual violence as providing a crucial dynamic for the founding of new political communities? Is this pattern of thinking one that still affects us today? Do such narratives rationalize the wartime use of sexual violence as necessary for political change (Matthes 2000: 168–69)? Are media representations of atrocities and the response of international bystanders also influenced by the assumption that political beginnings take place over the dead bodies of women? What logic underpins stories in which a woman who is a member of a community is portrayed as suffering violence so that her community can take new shape? We have become used to thinking of sexual violence as a phenomenon that takes place between warring parties, so that rape is understood as an attack on the enemy who is unable to protect its women and its territory. It was this bit of wisdom that was encapsulated in the cheyenne Indian saying,“A nation is not conquered until the women’s hearts lay on the ground” (Arcel 1998: 184). But with this habit of thought, we overlook the ways in which sexual violence within a community also may play a decisive role for political transformations. If we focus on the narrative logic that links sexual violence with political foundations, can we loosen the grip that this pattern has on 26 Robin May Schott our imagination? or do these narratives loosen progressive impulses in the minds of contemporary interpreters? The relation between sexual violence and political transformations can be placed against a cultural, literary, mythical, psychological, and religious background of views about the relation between birth and death. In ordinary understanding, we often treat birth and death as opposites. They are at opposite ends of the life-cycle,with the concept of birth marking beginnings and origins, while the concept of death marks endings and separation. yet scholars of myth and religion have long since pointed to the ways in which these concepts are deeply embedded in one another. As the classical scholar Jane Harrison has pointed out, certain Greek festivals, such as the wine festival of Anthesteria, which celebrated the opening of new wine, reveal both the positive and the threatening dimensions of death. During this festival, the spirits of the dead were believed to rise up for three days and fill the city with pollution.An offering of seeds to the souls of the dead was prepared for the dual purpose of appeasing them and also allowing the dead to take the seeds below the earth and then give them back to the living in the autumn. The role of the dead in nurturing the seeds is familiar to us in the function of the earth mother. Aeschylus writes of “Earth herself, that bringeth all things to birth, and, having nurtured them, receiveth their increase in turn.”While death plays a life-giving role in the cycle of life for the community, death is also life-threatening, since it brings the end of the life of the individual (Schott 1993: 28–29). The ancient view that birth and death are embedded in each other is echoed in religious views more familiar to the contemporary reader. In Genesis, chapter 3, of the Hebrew Bible, Adam’s and Eve’s eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge and life is the cause of human mortality. And in christianity, the sacrifice of God in the figure of christ connects death to new life (Spielrein 1912: 491–92). Twentieth-century psychoanalysts have also explored the...

Share