How Creationists Built the Campaign against Evolution
Publication Year: 2013
Published by: University of Illinois Press
Download PDF (118.4 KB)
Download PDF (167.0 KB)
Download PDF (299.7 KB)
Download PDF (147.8 KB)
I am indebted to several individuals for assistance in this endeavor. Paul Ash-down and Dwight Teeter, colleagues and coconspirators on other projects, provided valuable suggestions for improving the manuscript. Dzmitry Yuron, Natalie Manayev, and Ioana Coman helped mine that seemingly endless vein of popular media that were relevant to this topic. Foremost, Robert Caudill, ...
Download PDF (383.3 KB)
... After World War I, divisions that had been boiling below the sur-face of a modernizing, but still agrarian, nation erupted. For some, the war showed what could happen in an industrial world gone mad. For others, the currents of disruptive new knowledge confirmed that some people would be left behind in their shells of quaint tradition. A Tennessee town became ...
Download PDF (388.9 KB)
... Antievolutionism did not spontaneously generate itself in 1925, the year of the Scopes trial, though one might think so in reading press ac-counts of subsequent innumerable cases involving teaching evolution in public schools.1 All of them seem to be “Scopes 2.” There is justification for the now clichéd label attached to cases involving religious objections to ...
Download PDF (417.1 KB)
...history when two individuals really did personify two major, antagonistic streams of thought in American society. Both had made their reputations in progressive causes, allied with the Democratic Party. But they saw different avenues to reform. Bryan believed religion informed all walks of life, includ-ing politics and science.1 Darrow saw education, including science, and mod-...
Download PDF (441.0 KB)
... Bryan’s death threw fundamentalism into some disarray. 1 The move-ment lost focus, but not energy, as creationists reorganized, established pub-lications, and took advantage of new media platforms—radio in the 1930s and television in the 1950s. The loss of Bryan’s leadership meant reorganizing and rethinking his progressive politics and liberal interpretation, by literalist ...
Download PDF (429.9 KB)
... Defining “creationism” had become even more problematic by the 1990s. The term could encompass the traditional “young-Earthers,” who believed life and Earth were created spontaneously less than 10,000 years ago and that humans came into being in their present form. The term also could include those who accepted an old Earth, thereby accommodating ...
Download PDF (398.4 KB)
... Bryan’s twenty-first-century resurrection occurred in two places in the heartland. The first was Kansas, just south of his native Nebraska, the second a small town in Pennsylvania. In both cases, Bryanesque rhetoric permeated fervent appeals to individual rights and democratic principles.1 One side fumed for science and against theocracy. The other side railed about ...
Download PDF (396.2 KB)
... Dover’s “Scopes 2” and Kansas’s design debacle were signal events, showcasing phenomena that no longer represented a mere oddity in Ameri-can culture. Though creationists lost in Dover and Kansas, the events reflected a movement that had crept from an intellectual backwater to the political mainstream.1 Before 2005, the teaching of evolution already was designated ...
Download PDF (424.5 KB)
... By the end of the twentieth century, the Scopes trial was no longer a humiliation for creationists but an indignation.1 The problem, according to creationists, had been to make any compromise with literalism’s naysay-ers. Creationists recast and remythologized Scopes as a lesson, their defining moment in the fight against evolution. They turned to a media and political ...
Download PDF (375.8 KB)
... The Scopes trial was the first public performance of modern Amer-ica’s science-versus-religion drama.1 Its high visibility and dramatic quality gave it a special place in the subsequent fight because the trial defined terms and tactics that have endured into the twenty-first century for the antievolu-tion movement. Creationists still use Bryan’s arguments against evolution ...
Download PDF (457.8 KB)
Download PDF (376.6 KB)
Page Count: 216
Publication Year: 2013