Beyond the Schoolhouse Gate: Free Speech and the Inculcation of Values
Publication Year: 1995
Published by: Temple University Press
Several people who assisted me in this project deserve thanks. The staff at Temple University Press have been both professional and patient in guiding me through the publication process. I am grateful for their initial interest and generous support. ...
One. Pursuing Excellence and Order
To protest their nation's involvement in the Vietnam War, three Des Moines, Iowa, students arrived at school in December 1965 wearing black armbands. School officials promptly suspended them for violating a recently adopted policy prohibiting such actions. The United States Supreme Court, in a landmark 1969 case, held that the suspensions violated the First Amendment.1 ...
Two. The Emergence of Children's Rights
To understand the difficulty of forging constitutional rights for adolescents, we must appreciate the tension between social integration and individual autonomy. As a semiautonomous stage of development, adolescence is both a period in itself and a transitional time of trial and error.1 Franklin Zimring notes the disjuncture between the static legal position of adolescents and the contours of this stage: ...
Three. Free Speech and Public Education
How congruent are the aims of public education and free-speech principles? What problems arise in reconciling the inculcative function (the transmission of values) of public schooling with free speech? Commentators often find this relationship adversarial, so that advancing one requires hindering the other. David Diamond, for example, exalts the inculcative function and argues that, since the principal business ...
Four. A Focused Balancing Alternative
Building a principled foundation for extending First Amendment protection to public school students requires an examination of the types of First Amendment problems confronting the federal courts and the prevailing doctrines employed by the bench to resolve them. This foundation also requires replacing public forum analysis with a "focused balancing" alternative. Finally, we need to clarify what we mean by "student speech." ...
Five. Tolerating Student Speech
Student free-speech disputes, in large measure, arise in three contexts. Some disputes concern the refusal by school officials to permit or tolerate certain speech. Others involve incidents in which school officials decline to associate the public schools with certain types of student speech. A third area relates to efforts by school officials to control student access to adult expression. ...
Six. Assisting Student Expression
Students frequently ask school officials for three kinds of assistance in promoting their ideas and beliefs: funding, faculty supervision, and access to school facilities. Fearing that such assistance associates the school system with controversial, distasteful student speech, school officials deny many of these requests. When they do grant them, administrators usually ...
Seven. Access to Information and Ideas
While toleration and association disputes involve direct student expression, indoctrination disputes consider whether the First Amendment confers upon public school pupils a "right to receive" information and ideas from third parties. The bulk of disputes over such a right concern the removal of books from school libraries.1 ...
Eight. A Matter of Degree
Given the dual pursuits of academic excellence and classroom order, educational reform efforts invariably affect the constitutional rights of public school students. Accordingly, the United States Supreme Court has granted them some measure of First Amendment speech protection. Not surprisingly, the Court's effort displeases ...
Publication Year: 1995
OCLC Number: 630115862
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Beyond the Schoolhouse Gate: Free Speech and the Inculcation of Values