In this Book

Russian Minority Politics in Post-Soviet Latvia and Kyrgyzstan
summary

The collapse of the Soviet Union suddenly rendered ethnic Russians living in non-Russian successor states like Latvia and Kyrgyzstan new minorities subject to dramatic political, economic, and social upheaval. As elites in these new states implemented formal policies and condoned informal practices that privileged non-Russians, ethnic Russians had to react. In Russian Minority Politics in Post-Soviet Latvia and Kyrgyzstan, Michele E. Commercio draws on extensive field research, including hundreds of personal interviews, to analyze the responses of minority Russians to such policies and practices. In particular, she focuses on the role played by formal and informal institutions in the crystallization of Russian attitudes, preferences, and behaviors in these states.

Commercio asks why there is more out-migration and less political mobilization among Russians in Kyrgyzstan, a state that adopts policies that placate both Kyrgyz and Russians, and less out-migration and more political mobilization among Russians in Latvia, a state that adopts policies that favor Latvians at the expense of Russians. Challenging current thinking, she suggests that the answer to this question lies in the power of informal networks.

After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Communist party, Komsomol youth organization, and KGB networks were transformed into informal networks. Russians in Kyrgyzstan were for various reasons isolated from such networks, and this isolation restricted their access to the country's private sector, making it difficult for them to create effective associations capable of representing their interests. This resulted in a high level of Russian exit and the silencing of Russian voices. In contrast, Russians in Latvia were well connected to such networks, which provided them with access to the country's private sector and facilitated the establishment of political parties and nongovernmental organizations that represented their interests. This led to a low level of Russian exit and high level of Russian voice. Commercio concludes that informal networks have a stronger influence on minority politics than formal institutions.

Table of Contents

  1. Cover
  2. restricted access Download |
  1. Title Page
  2. restricted access Download |
  1. Copyright Page
  2. restricted access Download |
  1. Table of Content
  2. p. v
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Note on Transliteration
  2. p. vii
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Part I
  2. p. 1
  1. Chapter 1. ‘‘What the Hell Kind of ‘Non-Native’ Am I’’?
  2. pp. 3-16
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Chapter 2. Informal Networks, Exit, and Voice
  2. pp. 17-26
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Chapter 3. Soviet Socialist Legacies and Post-Soviet Nationalization
  2. pp. 27-50
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Chapter 4. Opportunity Structures and the Role of Informal Networks in Their Reconfiguration
  2. pp. 51-88
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Part II
  2. p. 89
  1. Chapter 5. Native Versus Non-Native: Russian Perceptions of Post-Soviet Nationalization
  2. pp. 91-106
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Chapter 6. Russian Responses to Perceptions of Socioeconomic Prospects
  2. pp. 107-153
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Chapter 7. Ethnic Systems in Transition
  2. pp. 154-177
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Appendix: Methods
  2. pp. 179-187
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Notes
  2. pp. 189-219
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Bibliography
  2. pp. 221-235
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Index
  2. pp. 237-245
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Acknowledgments
  2. pp. 247-248
  3. restricted access Download |
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.