Front Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Table of Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. v-vi

read more

Preface

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. vii-viii

The issue of whether the insurance industry in the United States should be regulated by the states or by the federal government has been the subject of considerable debate over the last century and a half. The states have success-fully defended the primacy of their authority, but an increasing number of insurers have come to favor an optional federal charter. The debate over an optional federal charter is lodged within a broader discussion of who should reg-...

read more

The Future of Insurance Regulation: An Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-12

The question of who should regulate the insurance industry has been debated in the United States since the time of the Civil War. Insurance continues to be regulated by the states despite several challenges to their authority over the years. The states’ authority over insurance was supported in various court decisions until the Southeastern Underwriters case in 1944.1 In that case, the Supreme Court determined that the commerce clause of the Constitution applied to...

read more

The Insurance Industry and Its Regulation: An Overview

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 13-52

Insurance regulation in the United States has been steeped in controversy over its 200-year history. In its early years, industry and regulatory failures prompted reforms and the coalescence of insurance oversight into a state regulatory framework. Beginning in the mid-1800s both the industry and its state regulators have been subject to a series of federal challenges. The states’ regulatory authority was reaffirmed in these challenges, most recently with the passage of the...

Part I: Framework for Insurance Regulation

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 53-54

read more

An Optional Federal Charter for Insurance: Rationale and Design

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 55-96

Since the early nineteenth century the states have been the principal authority for the regulation of the U.S. insurance industry. In contrast to other financial services such as securities and banking, Congress has not sought to exercise either concurrent or preemptive authority over insurers on a wide scale.1 Indeed,the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 explicitly found state regulation of insurance to be in the public interest and provided that no federal law should “invalidate,...

read more

Dual Insurance Chartering: Potential Consequences

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 97-114

The release in March 2008 of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Blueprint for a Modernized Financial Regulatory Structure added fuel to a long-simmering debate over the relative merits of state and federal insurance regulation.1 The blue-print was developed in response to concerns expressed by some policymakers and capital market participants that the current financial services regulatory structure is ill suited to the globalization of capital markets and the increasing complexity...

Part II: Insurance Regulatory Policies

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 115-116

read more

Insurance Regulation: The Need for Policy Reform

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 117-144

Beyond the push for increasing the federal role in insurance regulation, there is strong pressure for reforming insurance regulatory policies. Indeed, proponents of an optional federal charter (OFC) for insurance envision that federal officials would adopt policies that would significantly diverge from current state regulatory policies in a number of key areas. At the same time, the creation of an OFC would still leave an optional state framework in place, and the states would...

read more

Consumer Benefits of an Optional Federal Charter: The Case of Auto Insurance

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 145-164

A key element of most legislative proposals to establish an optional federal charter (OFC) for insurers is that market competition rather than government regulation would set insurance rates. Insurers choosing the federal charter,therefore, would be free to set premiums based on their actuarial calculations of risk and other competitive considerations. The market would discipline insurers and, as in other sectors, would keep premiums in line with claims, other expenses,...

Part III: Insurance Regulation, Financial Convergence, and International Trade

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 165-166

read more

Convergence in Financial Services Markets: Effects on Insurance Regulation

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 167-188

Convergence in financial services refers to two quite different developments,each of which is likely to have a different but cumulative effect on regulatory structure. The most obvious form of convergence is conglomeration among banks, securities firms, and insurance companies, an effect that is largely the result of banking organizations—freed to do so by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA)—acquiring insurance and securities affiliates. To a much lesser extent,...

read more

U.S. Insurance Regulation in a Competitive World Insurance Market: An Evaluation

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 189-220

There are long-standing charges that U.S. insurance regulation acts as a barrier to entry and discriminates unfairly against foreign insurers, resulting in a less competitive and robust national insurance market. Simultaneously, many U.S. insurers believe that the U.S. regulatory system hampers them in international competition and that other countries cite it to justify their own trade barriers against them. This chapter addresses these and related issues in the context...

Contributors

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 221-222

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 223-232