Shakespeare and Chekhov in Production and Reception
Theatrical Events and Their Audiences
Publication Year: 2005
Tulloch positions these concepts and methodologies within a broader current theatrical debate between postmodernity and risk modernity. He also describes the continuing history of Shakespeare and Chekhov as a series of stories “currently and locally told” in the context of a blurring of academic genres that frames the two writers. Drawn from research conducted over nearly a decade in Australia, Britain, and the U.S., Shakespeare and Chekhov in Production and Reception will be of interest to students and scholars of theatre studies, media studies, and audience research.
Published by: University of Iowa Press
Series: Studies Theatre Hist & Culture
This book is about theatrical events, in particular, productions of Shakespeare and Chekhov in mainstream theatre, and their audiences. As a book of case studies, it represents a methodological exploration into theatre production and audience research over several years. In line with...
Part 1: Introduction
1. Defining Theatrical Event and Audience Research
Two casual observations of theatre audiences help introduce the project for this book. They are both of teenagers watching performances of Shakespeare. One was in 1999 at the Barbican Theatre, London, for a performance of The Tempest. The other was in 2001...
2. Spectatorship, Social Audiences, and Risk: Shakespeare at the Q Theatre
In early March 2001 I was standing on the railway station platform right opposite the Q Theatre in Penrith, New South Wales, twenty-five miles from the center of Sydney. I had just seen an evening performance of Much Ado about Nothing by the Railway Street Theatre Company. Near me on the platform waiting for...
Part 2: Production/Audience Studies
3. Imagining Audiences: The Eyre/Griffiths Productions of The Cherry Orchard
Following Annette Kuhn’s understanding of both spectators and social audiences as discursive constructs, with “certain discourses possessing greater constitutive authority as specific moments than others” (1987, 347), an important advantage of a production analysis is that it allows a focus on the multimedial “authorship” of theatre...
4. The “Reading Chekhov” Project: Social Audiences and Reading Formations
Laurence Senelick’s valuable book The Chekhov Theatre: A Century of Plays in Performance is among the very few production-focused studies of Chekhov. Senelick clearly did not like the Eyre/Griffiths production of The Cherry Orchard. To understand why, we need to go beyond Senelick’s concerns about “vociferous socialism” and “Marxist dialectic” —though these are important...
5. The Theatrical Event: Inner and Outer Audience Frames
This chapter returns to the live stage. It moves from the macroto the micro-audience, following Susan Bennett’s point that the symptomatic theatre audience consists of small groups of family and friends. It also moves from the “mediated” to the “live” audience. At this point, the “Reading Chekhov” project laid...
Part 3: Theatrical Event Studies
6. Cultural Contexts: Theatrical Event, Liminality, and Risk in The Free State
I was initially drawn to the Theatre Royal, Bath (TRB), because they were producing three very different versions of Chekhov within three months, between March and June 2000: Janet Suzman’s political setting of The Cherry Orchard within the “new citizenship” of postapartheid South Africa; the state-subsidized Royal...
7. Cultural Contexts:Theatrical Event, Liminality, and Risk in The Free State
Janet Suzman’s The Free State was conceived in the South Africa of apartheid. In this national context, in a harsher version of the scientific “bads” of Beck’s risk society, science and technology were frequently used as repressive tools: life destruction, surveillance,social control,and the kind of torture that accounts for Leko’s damaged hands, which he waves around “too much” in Suzman’s play. The Free State...
8. Playing Culture: Pleasurable Play in The Free State and The Cherry Orchard
Playing culture is central to Sauter’s communicative model of theatre research and to his definition of a theatrical event as “the communicative mutuality of performer and spectator, the elements of play, and their dependence on the surrounding contexts” (2000, 14). Theatre audiences do not respond to a “political”play like Janet Suzman’s The Free State as though it is a political speech, though...
9. Theatrical Playing: Much Ado,Mediatization, and “Liveness,”
Theatrical playing, in Willmar Sauter’s historical example, has three aspects: “[F]rom many reviews we can learn that Sarah Bernhardt always was present as stage personality, as artist, and as role. In other words, she functioned simultaneously and with equal strength on the sensory, the artistic, and the symbolic levels.” So in...
This book has tried to bring together two ways of mapping the theatrical event in terms of audience research. The first has been to examine the issue from a production approach, exploring the situating of spectator positions (or, in Pertti Alasuutari’s term, the process of audiencing) during production.Part 2 of the book...
Illustrations: 20 photos
Publication Year: 2005
Series Title: Studies Theatre Hist & Culture
Series Editor Byline: John Smith, Will Wordsworth See more Books in this Series
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Shakespeare and Chekhov in Production and Reception