Battle over the Bench
Senators, Interest Groups, and Lower Court Confirmations
Publication Year: 2010
Published by: University of Virginia Press
List of Tables and Figures
As with many projects, the list of those who have helped this book be-come a reality is numerous. The book is based on work begun at the University of California, Berkeley, and many professors and fellow graduate students provided excellent advice, feedback, and support; it is highly likely that any good ideas are theirs. Robert A. Kagan, my dissertation ...
Introduction: The Changing Tone of Lower Federal Court Confirmations
On May 9, 2001, President George W. Bush sent his fi rst set of nomina-tions for the lower federal courts to the Senate. This list included Texas Supreme Court justice Priscilla Owen, who was nominated to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Almost immediately, battle cries were heard from liberal judicial watchdog groups, pro- choice groups, and Senate ...
1 What Makes a Nomination Run into Trouble? Senators, Interest Groups, and the Four Tracks to Confirmation
The staffing of the federal judiciary has taken on enormous importance in recent decades as more and more people have realized the reach and consequences of judicial decisions. Especially with regard to the federal appeals courts—the thirteen circuit courts and the Supreme Court—the appointment of new judges can infl uence the formation of public policy ...
2 Death to Nominees: Senatorial Courtesy and the Ability to “Kill” Judicial Confirmations
According to the four tracks framework explicated in chapter 1, each nominee should be viewed as a train that follows a unique set of train tracks from nomination to confi rmation. By conceptualizing the lower court confi rmation process as a set of interconnected train tracks, we can better understand the diﬀ erent confi rmation environments nominees ...
3 “Herding Cats”: Holds and Private Political Fights
Chapter 2 outlined the use of senatorial courtesy, an informal custom that allows home- state senators to block an objectionable judicial nom-inee from progressing past the nomination stage. This chapter begins our examination of what can happen to nominations once they receive home- state senator approval and begin to move through the confi rma-...
4 Interest Groups and Judicial Confirmations: A View from the Senate
While considerable media and popular attention has been concentrated on the role outside interest groups play in the modern-day federal judicial confirmation process, in reality, we know relatively little about the activities of these groups. Conventional wisdom suggests that outside groups drive the process itself, setting the terms of the debate and dictating the ...
5 Interest Groups and the Decision to Object: Sending Confirmations down the Public Partisan Track
Senators and their staffs require in-depth information on every single judicial nominee. Interest groups help fill this information gap by serving as an important informal source of information. When a nominee begins to move through the confirmation process, groups may decide to adopt a more active lobbying strategy and publicly object to the...
6 Whither Nominees? The Fate of Nominations Sent down the Public Partisan Track
Chapters 4 and 5 outlined the important roles interest groups play in judicial confi rmations. Chapter 4, based on interviews with Senate staﬀ , highlighted groups’ information-transmission role. Because senators and their staﬀ lack the resources to conduct in- depth investigations of each and every lower court nominee, groups serve a vital purpose by helping ...
Conclusion: What the Future Holds for Lower Court Nominations and the Senate Confirmation Process
This book tells the story of how presidents, senators, interest groups, and concerned citizens battle over who sits on the federal courts. In one sense, it is the story of how individual senators possess enormous power over the operation of the Senate and the fate of judicial nominees; in another sense it is the story of how mobilized activists and citizens play a significant role in determining who will be confirmed...
Page Count: 272
Illustrations: 5 graphs, 22 tables
Publication Year: 2010
OCLC Number: 753977919
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Battle over the Bench