Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Copyright

pdf iconDownload PDF

p. iv

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF

p. v

read more

Philosophy and Rhetoric: An Abbreviated History of an Evolving Identity

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-14

With this volume, Philosophy and Rhetoric begins its fortieth year of publication. As a milestone of longevity, it is both a mark of its youth and its maturity. Most disciplines have flagship journals with considerably longer spans of continuous publication, in some cases exceeding 100 years. Philosophy and Rhetoric, however, has no professional society as its sponsor. Its survival has and continues ...

read more

The Philosophical Basis of Rhetoric

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 15-26

I want to begin by distinguishing between what has a philosophical basis at all and what has none. Science, history, morals, and art have a philosophical basis. Fishing, tennis, needlecraft, and carpentry do not. The criterion that determines membership in each list is simple: an activity has a philosophical basis if, and only if, the practice of it distinguishes man from the animals. It must be disqualified ...

read more

Philosophical Rhetoric

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 27-35

I knew Henry Johnstone as a colleague and friend for nearly three decades, one of which was the decade (1976–87) during which I served as editor of Philosophy and Rhetoric. My editorship fell between Johnstone’s first tenure as founder and editor and his second period of editorship, during his retirement. Johnstone introduced me to the importance of rhetoric while we were colleagues at Penn ...

read more

Theoretical Pieties, Johnstone’s Impiety, and Ordinary Views of Argumentation

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 36-50

The greatest single influence on rhetorical theory throughout its long history, and likewise on its daughter or sister enterprise, the theory of argument, has without doubt been students. In part, the influence has been bad. Docile students have (it seems) offered little resistance to their teachers’ theoretical hobbyhorses, being willing to cram for the exam, or the speech, fantastical systems of staseis, topoi, figurae and five ...

read more

Kinship: The Relationship Between Johnstone’s Ideas About Philosophical Argument And The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Of Argumentation

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 51-70

As he himself declared in Validity and Rhetoric in Philosophical Argument (1978, 1), the late philosopher Henry W. Johnstone Jr. devoted a long period of his professional life to clarifying the nature of philosophical argument. His well-known view was that philosophical arguments are sui generis, i.e., not to be judged by the standards of argumentation in science or everyday discourse. ...

read more

Rhetoric Achieves Nature: A View from Old Europe

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 71-88

I would like to quote a well-known example used by Frege to illustrate the difference between Sinn and Bedeutung, as a point of departure for this essay: Venus is the morning star and the evening star—it depends on the beholder1—but Venus, the celestial body, it objectively is. In the eyes of the beholder lies “sense” (Sinn); in an objective view, resides “reference” (Bedeutung). Or, to put ...

read more

On Rhetoric as Gift/Giving

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 89-107

In this essay, I explore the possibilities of rhetoric as gift. I begin with the Homeric gift economy and the rhetorical resources of this economy.1 My use of “economy” here is not reducible to a monetary exchange system, but rather a more general system of practices orchestrating cultural identity and relations. As Georges Bataille suggests, studying a general economy may hold the key to ...

read more

Rhetorical Criticism and the Challenges of Bilateral Argument

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 108-118

To assume editorial responsibilities for Philosophy & Rhetoric after Henry W. Johnstone was to have assumed rather a lot. He was, for starters, a philospher, and I am not. This much appeared to bother Henry not a bit, and in fact it proved the occasion of many productive discussions and facilitated my apprenticeship in ways for which I am still grateful. By trade a rhetorical critic, I was particularly ...

read more

The Faith and Struggle of Beginning (with) Words: On the Turn Between Reconciliation and Recognition

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 119-146

In a beginning that strives to constitute the grounds for understanding from the terms of fate’s violence, the promise of the word is not (self) fulfilling. Caught within those conflicts that ban the self from its own voice and which use the codicils of law’s precedent to deter expression and collective (inter)action, the power of language is simultaneously rendered absolute and suspect. As such ...

read more

No Time for Mourning: The Rhetorical Production of the Melancholic Citizen-Subject in the War on Terror

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 147-169

At the same time that the Bush Administration’s declaration of the so-called war on terror and intervention in Iraq exacerbated tensions between its long-standing allies as well as enemies on the international front, it miraculously delivered the American people back to itself. Suddenly a whole host of high-profile domestic conflicts on whose outcome the very viability of the nation was said ...

read more

Oral Rhetoric, Rhetoric, and Literature

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 170-187

In 1960, Professor Donald R. Pearce edited and published a small volume entitled The Senate Speeches of W. B. Yeats.1 Some editorial decisions Pearce made serve to focus attention on what the distinctive features of spoken, instigative discourse may be.2 Pearce included in his volume of “speeches” a body of extensively interrupted discourse on divorce, delivered in the Irish Senate. This material comprises ...

Back Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF