The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era
Publication Year: 2002
Published by: University of Michigan Press
... and Sciences for the spring semester of 1994; and to finish the ‹rst draft, a sabbatical leave granted by the Department of History and the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences for the fall semester of 1998. In addition, in 1998 the Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research awarded me an Arts, Architecture, and Humanities Equipment Award to purchase a laptop computer. ...
Chapter One: Introduction
... despite weaknesses in his brief. Of the eleven trials analyzed in this volume, none definitely resulted in condemnation, eight definitely ended with acquittal, and two—or possibly three, if we opt for extreme caution in saying that we do not know the outcome of the trial of Roscius of Ameria (see chap. 8)—have uncertain outcomes. The failure of most or perhaps all of ...
Part One - Extortion
... something material, usually money. Such complaints, since they generally originated with those living under the power of Roman governors, were naturally brought to the Senate. The lex Calpurnia established a permanent committee of the Senate to adjudicate these complaints. The law of 149 provided for the return of simple damages to aggrieved parties who won their ...
Chapter Two: In M. Fonteium
Fonteio Marcus Tullius exsequitur, quod eius causa non sit eadem quae Verris” [ . . . as in his speech for Fonteius Cicero develops the argument that his case is not the same as that of Verres].1 Since Cicero had just prosecuted Verres and was now defending Fonteius, it is quite natural that he would want his audience to think that the two cases were entirely different. The ...
Chapter Three: In L. Valerium Flaccum
... defended him. He was one of Cicero’s most distinguished clients; not only was he a patrician, but with the exception of his grandfather, C. Valerius Flaccus, he came from a direct, six-generation line of consulars going back to his namesake, the consul of 261.1 Yet Cicero’s brief was a dif‹cult one, and while he was able to secure an acquittal for Flaccus (according to ...
Chapter Four: In M. Aemilium Scaurum
... are two reasons for the gaps in our knowledge: ‹rst, we have only part of Cicero’s speech, contained in two large fragments from palimpsests and in fragments from Asconius and a few other authors; second, Cicero defended only “part” of Scaurus’s case (“. . . cum ego partem eius ornatissime defendissem” [ . . . part of him being defended by me in my best style] ...
Chapter Five: In C. Rabirium Postumum
... small addition to a case that has already been decided and in which a guilty verdict has been rendered] (Rab. Post. 8). This legal procedure took much less time than a regular trial; in fact, Ramsey argues that it was of a type that could conceivably be completed from start to finish within one day.1 The causa, which had already been iudicata (adjudicated) by the time this case ...
Part Two - Electoral Malpractice
... of candidates eligible for higher office,2 and this competition must have been particularly intense for the consulate, which was still held by only two people each year. Cloud suggests that the breakdown of traditional clientela (clientship) relationships and an increased role for money may have created a need for this kind of legislation.3 That view might seem to reflect ...
Chapter Six: In L. Licinium Murenam
A disappointed candidate put together a coalition to prosecute one of the victors, who responded by collecting a team of highly competent and politically in›uential orators. They were able to fend off the attack, and Murena went on to serve as consul in 62. That Ser. Sulpicius Rufus (praetor in 65) prosecuted calls for little comment, as it was probably quite usual for a defeated candidate to participate ...
Chapter Seven: In Cn. Plancium
... farmers and fair to the provincials], 63). In 59, rather than put himself in a position where he would have to swear to uphold Caesar’s two agrarian laws, he withdrew his candidacy for the tribunate of 58 and was thought to have acted honorably in so doing (“Laterensis existimatur laute fecisse quod tribunatum pl. petere destitit ne iuraret” [Laterensis . . . is thought to ...
Part Three - Homicide and Violence
... were directly harmed by these crimes, the threat to public law and order provided the rationale for these statutes.1 Such crimes were different from extortion and electoral malpractice—as well as from the crimes of maiestas and peculatus (treason and embezzlement), neither of which gave rise to a trial that produced an extant speech of Cicero—in that they did not relate ...
Chapter Eight: In Sex. Roscium Amerinum
... finds himself accused of arranging the murder of his father. Two kinsmen, who had been engaged in an intrafamilial quarrel with the murder victim, ally themselves with an upstart freedman potentate in the camp of a victorious general, Sulla, and arrange to have all the family property stripped from Roscius and given to themselves. To guarantee their undisturbed ...
Chapter Nine: In A. Cluentium Habitum
.. own name (iudicium Iunianum), one which reverberated through at least seven other cases in the next few years (TLRR nos. 153–54, 159–61, 170, 172, possibly 162). Yet the individuals involved came from the lower end of the social strata visible to us today, the domi nobiles from municipia across the Apennines from Rome, who as individuals were politically dominant only ...
Chapter Ten: In P. Cornelium Sullam
... criminal courts of the period, lost his opportunity to hold Rome’s highest annual office because of a successful ambitus prosecution in 66, as did his fellow consul-designate P. Autronius Paetus. As a result, under the provisions of the lex Calpurnia de ambitu, besides losing the consulate, he was expelled from the Roman Senate, could never again hold public office, and ...
Chapter Eleven: In P. Sestium
... speech. Second, given that one of the main voids we face is the lack of extant “inartificial proofs,” such as testimony and documents, we might expect that we would gain a particularly close view of that aspect of this case from a speech by Cicero, the In Vatinium, that is supposed to be a response to the testimony of one of the witnesses, Vatinius; yet Cicero’s attack on ...
Chapter Twelve: In M. Caelium Rufum
... popular poet today, Catullus, wrote obsessively about the person whom Cicero would like us to believe is the central, though hidden, character in the trial. But the sources’ literary acclaim does not guarantee their historical importance. On the one hand, this trial can be viewed as a minor episode in the use of trials for nonjudicial purposes, when a young ...
Chapter Thirteen: Conclusion
... the two sides presented may not have always determined the outcome. The jurors may have been swayed by the personal prestige of the defendant or lack thereof or by the prestige or rhetorical skills of the prosecutors and advocates in comparison with each other. They may have been swayed by political factors, especially as an air of crisis came to pervade the Roman ...
Index of Ancient Sources
Index of Names
Index of Topics
Page Count: 384
Publication Year: 2002
OCLC Number: 621466894
MUSE Marc Record: Download for The Case for the Prosecution in the Ciceronian Era