In this Book

A Good Quarrel
buy this book Buy This Book in Print
summary
Courtroom proceedings offer the thrill of a sporting event and the drama of a stage production as lawyers match wits, grill witnesses, and introduce eleventh-hour elements that may upend the course of a trial. The most decisive contests play out in the U.S. Supreme Court, where lawyers debate the meaning of the highest law—the Constitution—before the highest legal authorities—the nine justices. In A Good Quarrel, the nation's best court reporters discuss the most memorable cases of the past fifty years. These journalists not only recreate the key moments of the oral arguments, they analyze the attorneys' and justices' strategic use of rhetoric, logic, and emotional displays. In addition to a ringside account of each case, this volume provides web links to complete audio recordings of each oral argument and individual clips so that the reader can listen in on the debates that resolved a disputed presidential election, reconsidered women's rights, reassessed affirmative action, and decided many other pressing issues in the United States. Contributors: Charles Bierbauer Lyle Denniston Fred Graham Brent Kendall Steve Lash Richard Lazarus Dahlia Lithwick Tony Mauro Tim O'Brien David Savage Greg Stohr Nina Totenberg Timothy R. Johnson teaches in the political science department and the law school at the University of Minnesota. Jerry Goldman teaches political science at Northwestern University and directs the OYEZ Project, a multimedia archive devoted to the Supreme Court.

Table of Contents

  1. Cover
  2. restricted access Download |
  1. Front Matter
  2. restricted access Download |
  1. Foreword
  2. pp. vii-x
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Contents
  2. pp. xi-xii
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Preface
  2. pp. xiii-xvi
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Introduction: The Role of Oral Arguments in the Supreme Court
  2. pp. 1-10
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Elk Grove Uni‹ed School District v. Newdow: Ten Commandments of Oral Arguments
  2. pp. 11-19
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Forsyth County, Georgia v. the Nationalist Movement: A Workman-like Performance
  2. pp. 20-41
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Planned Parenthood of S.E. Pennsylvania v. Casey: The Rhetorical Battle over Roe
  2. pp. 42-60
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Bush v. Gore: Preparing for Oral Combat—the Fight for the Presidency
  2. pp. 61-73
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Glickman v. Wileman Brothers and Elliott Inc.: How Oral Arguments Led to a Lawsuit
  2. pp. 74-97
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Grutter v. Bollinger: An Argument for the Ages
  2. pp. 98-109
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Chandler v. Miller: Double Indemnity
  2. pp. 110-124
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Rapanos v. United States: Wading into the Wetlands
  2. pp. 125-144
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Randall v. Sorrell: Arguing over Campaign Finance in Vermont
  2. pp. 145-157
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. UAAAIWA v. Johnson Controls Inc.: Fighting for Women’s Rights in the Workplace
  2. pp. 158-168
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Time Inc. v. Hill: A Future President Makes His Case
  2. pp. 169-178
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Acknowledgments
  2. pp. 179-180
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Works Cited
  2. pp. 181-184
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Contributors
  2. pp. 185-188
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Index
  2. pp. 189-195
  3. restricted access Download |
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.