Praxis and Action
Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity
Publication Year: 1971
From the Introduction:
This inquiry is concerned with the themes of praxis and action in four philosophic movements: Marxism, existentialism, pragmatism, and analytic philosophy. It is rare that these four movements are considered in a single inquiry, for there are profound differences of emphasis, focus, terminology, and approach represented by these styles of thought. Many philosophers believe that similarities among these movements are superficial and that a close examination of them will reveal only hopelessly unbridgeable cleavages. While respecting the genuine fundamental differences of these movements, this inquiry is undertaken in the spirit of showing that there are important common themes and motifs in what first appears to be a chaotic babble of voices. I intend to show that the concern with man as an agent has been a primary focal point of each of these movements and further that each contributes something permanent and important to our understanding of the nature and context of human activity.
Published by: University of Pennsylvania Press
Table of Contents
Preface to the New Edition
Praxis ans action was originally published in 1971, but it represents the culmination of my thinking during the previous decade. Although it is difficult to recapture the mood of philosophy in America at that time, it was a period when...
THE TITLE OF THIS BOOK, "Praxis and Action," may seem redundant, but the redundancy is intentional. The Greek term "praxis" has an ordinary meaning that roughly corresponds to the ways in which we now commonly
THIS INQUIRY IS CONCERNED with the themes of praxis and action in four philosophic movements: Marxism, existentialism, pragmatism, and analytic philosophy. It is rare that these four movements are considered in a single inquiry,..
Part I. Praxis: Marx and the Hegelian Background
THE CHIEF DEFECT of all previous materialism (including Feuerbach's) is that the object, actuality, sensuousness is conceived only in the form of the object or perception [Anschauung], but not as sensuous human activity, practice [Praxis], nor subjectively. Hence in opposition to materialism the active side was developed by idealism-but only abstractly ...
Part II. Consciousness, Existence, and Action: Kierkegaard and Sartre
I ARGUED in Part I that Marx's distinctive orientation emerges from a radical critique of Hegel's philosophy. The dominant concept of praxis in Marx represents a dialectical transformation of Hegel's Geist, and Marx's own analysis of the conflict of classes can be read as a critical commentary on Hegel's brief, but penetrating, analysis ...
Part III. Action, Conduct, and Inquiry: Peirce and Dewey
IN MY DISCUSSIONS of Marx, Kierkegaard, and Sartre, I began by first exploring relevant aspects of Hegel's thought which set the "problematic" for their own investigations of human action. In the case of Marx, this approach enabled me to clarify the dialectical context of his theory of..
Part IV. The Concept of Action: Analytic Philosophy
MARXISME, EXISTENTIALISM, AND PRAGMATISM are all deeply rooted in nineteenth-century philosophy. One who is unfamiliar with this philosophic tradition-especially as developed during the period from Kant to Hegel-would be at...
IN APPROACHING THE END of this inquiry, I have arrived only at a beginning. My primary concern has been to present fair, sympathetic, although critical interpretations of each of the four positions...
Index of Names
Index of Subjects
Page Count: 368
Publication Year: 1971
OCLC Number: 586952947
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Praxis and Action