Levinas and Buber
Dialogue and Difference
Publication Year: 2004
Published by: Duquesne University Press
Title Page, Copyright
List of Abbreviations
Martin Buber (1878–1965) and Emmanuel Levinas (1906–1995) knew each other as associates and friends. Indeed, Buber instructed Maurice Friedman, one of the editors of this volume, to include contributions by Levinas to both The Philosophy of Martin Buber volume of The Library of Living Philosophers and the Martin Buber section...
1. Samuel and Agag
I once met on a journey a man whom I already knew through an earlier meeting. He was an observant Jew who followed the religious tradition in all the details of his life-pattern. But what was for me essential (as had already become unmistakably clear to me at that first meeting) was that this relationship to tradition had its origin and...
2. On Buber
Yes, I knew him personally after the war. My interest in the intersubjective relation, my principal theme, is often united with the philosophy of Buber, who distinguished the I-Thou, the relation between persons, from the I-It, the relation of man with things. The relation to the other man is irreducible to the knowledge of an...
3. Buber and Levinas: Philosophical Reflections on an Opposition
Between Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas there reigns — despite the high esteem in which Buber held Levinas and the honor that Levinas accorded Buber — an opposition. And one has to encounter all the fundamental causes of this contrast with philosophical wonder. A superficial observation already leads us to posit numerous...
4. Affection and the Transcendental Dialogical Personalism of Buber and Levinas
What can we say, now more than a century since his birth, is Martin Buber’s most important philosophical contribution? Should we take him seriously at all? Is it all poetry and mysticism, evocation with no follow-through? Despite the widespread use “I-Thou” jargon in psychology, philosophy, theology and elsewhere, Buber cannot be held...
5. “Failure of Communication” as a Surplus: Dialogue and Lack of Dialogue between Buber and Levinas
The proximity between Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas which is so striking to the external observer was not always so apparent to Buber and Levinas themselves. Levinas was initially preoccupied with differentiating or separating his own position from that of Buber. But having established the points of difference, he found himself then able...
6. Ethics and the Place of the Other
“Nothing could limit the homage due him” — such was Emmanuel Levinas’s estimation of Martin Buber (OS, 41). The numerous essays Levinas dedicated to the examination of Buber’s thought reveal the high esteem in which he held Buber.1 Yet these essays also demonstrate the profound disagreement between the two thinkers on a...
7. Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas: An Ethical Query
Juxtaposing Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas is irresistible. Both are solidly rooted in Judaism. Both are philosophers who have broken with the central thrust of philosophy from Plato to Heidegger in favor of a radical relation to otherness, alterity. Both are centrally concerned with ethics. Both link the relationship with God with the relationship...
8. Buber’s and Levinas’s Attitudes toward Judaism
Levinas and Buber have in common a reverence for human life as well as a philosophy of human relationship. They made an enormous contribution to the ethical thought and the religious consciousness of the twentieth century. The differences as well as the common ground between the two creative thinkers are seen in their different views of...
9. Revelation Here and Beyond: Buber and Levinas on the Bible
Buber and Levinas equally regard the Bible as a moral and spiritual wellspring of both Jewish and Western civilization, and agree that the modern reader has much to learn by turning back to the Hebrew Bible for instruction.1 For both thinkers, the Bible is the book in whose light we see and judge our social and historical condition, but it is also...
10. Reading Torah: The Discontinuity of Tradition
One of the most basic agreements between Levinas and Buber is a shared insight that what happens in the action of language, in the performance of signification or in the facing of another, is the origin of meaning. The pragmatic dimension of our relations to others, the way a sign relates to the ones who signify, who “use” the sign, governs...
11. Beyond The “Eclipse of God”: The Shoah in the Jewish Thought of Buber and Levinas
Post-Holocaust Jewish thought, perhaps surprisingly, is generally seen as a phenomenon that begins not in the 1940s or 1950s, but in the 1960s.1 The great Jewish theologians of the earlier part of the twentieth century, including the Orthodox thinker Joseph Soloveitchik, the conservative theologian Abraham Joshua Heschel, the founder of...
12. Reciprocity and the Height of God: A Defense of Buber against Levinas
There is a strong similarity between Martin Buber’s notion of the I-Thou relation and Emmanuel Levinas’s philosophy of respect for the other. Levinas recognizes this similarity and, as a result, Buber’s name continually appears in books and articles written throughout the course of Levinas’s career.1 Both thinkers stress the social or ethical aspect of...
IV. Heidegger, Humanism, and the Other Animal
13. Buber and Levinas — and Heidegger
The Levinas-Buber relation is a deep and instructive relationship.1 Martin Buber is senior and far better known. His book, I and Thou, first published in 1923, was immediately and widely recognized as an important spiritual work and quickly translated into many languages, including Japanese. Buber is himself a recognizable figure, the bearded...
14. The Retrieval of Humanism in Buber and Levinas
Few thoughts could appear more outmoded today than those that attempt to recover humanism. As Nietzsche suggests, we find ourselves in an age in which we have become “tired of man,” an age characterized above all by “modesty” regarding the self-knowledge and self-consciousness that has traditionally served as the hallmark of Western...
15. Face-to-Face with the Other Animal?
It is perhaps no exaggeration to say that the inclusion (Umfassung) (IT, 178) of nature within the I-Thou relation has been the biggest obstacle to the reception of Buber’s thought. Levinas is one critic for whom the possibility of Thou-saying (Du-Sagen) to nonhuman beings constitutes a retreat from the fundamental insight of I and Thou, which...
Page Count: 335
Publication Year: 2004
OCLC Number: 608927966
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Levinas and Buber