We cannot verify your location
Browse Book and Journal Content on Project MUSE

The Trace of Judaism

Dostoevsky, Babel, Mandelstam, Levinas

Val Vinokur

Publication Year: 2008

The defining quality of Russian literature, for most critics, is its ethical seriousness expressed through formal originality. The Trace of Judaism addresses this characteristic through the thought of the Lithuanian born Franco Jewish philosopher Emmanuel Levinas. Steeped in the Russian classics from an early age, Levinas drew significantly from Dostoevsky in his ethical thought. One can profitably read Russian literature through Levinas, and vice versa.

Published by: Northwestern University Press

Series: Studies in Russian Literature and Theory


pdf iconDownload PDF


pdf iconDownload PDF


pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. vii-viii

read more


pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. ix-x

This book first emerged as a dissertation under the kindly and hyperactive direction of Caryl Emerson, who did for me only what she continues to do for most of her Ph.D. students—which is to say, far more than can be optimistically expected even from the best of mentors. As a comparative literature student at Princeton, my work also benefited—intellectually, materially, or morally ...

List of Abbreviations

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. xi-2

read more

Introduction: Levinas and Russian Literature

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 3-14

The world wants to be seen. It demands one’s attention and response. This is an ethical demand and an aesthetic one. Nearly every artistic or literary manifesto claims to offer an aesthetic sensibility that will better “do justice” to the world. Wittgenstein’s cryptic assertion that “ethics and aesthetics are one and the same” feels strangely intuitive either because it must be true or because we need it to be true.1 ...

read more

1. Idiots and Demons: Dostoevsky’s Aesthetic Perils

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 15-34

Dostoevsky's characters tend toward vocal excess: excessive sincerity, insincerity, feeling, intellection, faith, doubt, and above all, excess speech. They talk too much. And their talk is typically charged with cosmic and practical questions of right and wrong—questions animated and muddled by the gales of human nature that Dostoevsky depicts so well. ...

read more

2. “And I Most of All”: Levinas in The Brothers Karamazov

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 35-59

"I'm leading you alternately between belief and disbelief,” the devil confesses to Ivan Karamazov, who is tormented because he is unable to sort out his responsibility in the murder of his father, Fyodor Pavlovich (PSS 15:80; BK 645). Nina Pelikan Straus notes a tonal kinship between Jacques Derrida and this shabby devil that Ivan hallucinates in The Brothers Karamazov.1 She suggests that Derrida’s late turn toward a “new ...

read more

3. Isaac Babel’s Dirty Ethics

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 60-92

It seems counterintuitive to make the leap from Dostoevsky to Isaac Babel. If anything, Babel, who wanted to write at least as well as Tolstoy and Maupassant, nominally sought to distance himself from Dostoevsky.1 In his cheerfully wry 1916 manifesto, “Odessa,” a 22-year-old Babel calls for a “Literary Messiah” to bring southern sunshine to Russian literature, citing Dostoevsky as the emblem of that dark Petersburg tradition ...

read more

4. Osip Mandelstam’s Judaism: Chaos and Cares

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 93-132

Poetry is synecdoche for all aesthetic activity because it seems like the most autonomous, least instrumental art, even as it retains a denotative link to the world at large. This paradoxically concrete signification-for-its-own-sake perhaps explains why almost anything remotely aesthetic may be described as poetic, if not always fictional or musical or architectural. It is appropriate, then, to conclude a book on ethics and ...

read more

Conclusion: The Ethics of Aesthetics, the Aesthetics of Ethics

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 133-136

The prevailing modes of ethical critciism, in Robert Eaglestone’s account, are “traditionalist” and “postmodernist.” The first looks to realist, “readerly” texts for a content-based ethics from literature. The second favors more “writerly” works that interrupt reading by evoking the gap between life, text, and interpretation - suggesting literature’s basic “unreadability” and therefore the need for an ethics of criticism.1 ...


pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 137-166


pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 167-178


pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 179-190

E-ISBN-13: 9780810162532
Print-ISBN-13: 9780810152083

Page Count: 216
Publication Year: 2008

Edition: 1
Series Title: Studies in Russian Literature and Theory
Series Editor Byline: Gary Saul Morson See more Books in this Series

OCLC Number: 798295883
MUSE Marc Record: Download for The Trace of Judaism

Research Areas


UPCC logo

Subject Headings

  • Babelʹ, I. (Isaak), 1894-1940 -- Criticism and interpretation.
  • Ethics.
  • Mandelʹshtam, Osip, -- 1891-1938 -- Criticism and interpretation.
  • Judaism in literature.
  • Aesthetics.
  • Judaism and literature.
  • Russian literature -- History and criticism.
  • Lévinas, Emmanuel -- Criticism and interpretation.
  • Dostoyevsky, Fyodor, -- 1821-1881 -- Criticism and interpretation.
  • You have access to this content
  • Free sample
  • Open Access
  • Restricted Access