The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe
Italy, Spain, and Romania, 1870–1945
Publication Year: 2010
Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press
pp. ix-x | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8543
This book grew out of my studies at UCLA and has consumed much of my life for the past ten years. But its core idea has a more precise origin: a warm August day in 2001 in the foothills of the Italian Alps in a small town called Torre Pellice. There, in a sunlit room with no books and only a laptop, it struck me that fascism had developed precisely in the dense...
List of Abbreviations
pp. xi-xiii | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8544
1. Civil Society and Fascism in Interwar Europe
pp. 1-22 | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8545
Between 1890 and 1914 an organizational revolution occurred in Europe as mutual aid societies, rural credit organizations, and cooperatives blossomed (Callahan 2000: 142– 148; Eidelberg 1974: 98; Lyttelton 2000: 69– 78; Tenfeld 2000: 85).1 Indeed, scholars have identified the last decade of the nineteenth century and the first decade of the twentieth century as a period of intensive development...
2. Party Fascism: Italy,1870–1938
pp. 23-71 | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8546
Why did Italy, instead of making a smooth transition from constitutional liberalism to mass democracy, produce the world’s first fascist regime, and why did this regime take the form of “party fascism”? The main argument of this chapter is that fascism was the consequence of rapid civil society development in a political context defined by three historically linked failures of hegemony...
3. Traditionalist Fascism: Spain,1876–1945
pp. 72-112 | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8547
Why did Spanish liberalism succumb to fascism, as opposed to developing as a mass democracy, and why did fascism in Spain assume a traditionalist form? The collapse of Spain’s democracy in the thirties derived from causes analogous to those in Italy: namely, the failure to develop a hegemonic politics in the face of an associational boom. As in Italy weak intraclass hegemony among the dominant ...
4. Statist Fascism: Romania,1881–1940
pp. 113-148 | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8548
The tension between the fascist movement and the fascist regime that eventually consolidated in Romania was much greater than in either Italy or Spain, for Romania produced a form of “statist fascism” between 1938 and 1940 premised on the violent suppression of its very large, and politically successful, fascist party. This regime, the dictatorship of King Carol II, adopted the language and ...
5. Considering Alternatives
pp. 149-192 | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8549
The analyses in chapters 2 through 4 have argued that the development of voluntary associations was a major factor in the emergence of fascism in Italy, Spain, and Romania. However, readers familiar with comparative analyses of fascism may rightly wonder how these cases fit with explanations that are not centered...
6. Rethinking Civil Society and Fascism
pp. 193-212 | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8550
I am now in a position to provide a fuller answer to the central query of this study: Why did civil society development lead to fascism rather than liberal democracy in Italy, Spain, and Romania in the interwar period? My argument is as follows. Civil society mobilization tended to promote democratic demands in interwar Italy, Spain, and Romania, as Tocquevillian analyses predict....
pp. 213-233 | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8551
pp. 235-250 | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8552
pp. 251-258 | DOI: 10.1353/chapter.8553
Page Count: 280
Publication Year: 2010
OCLC Number: 794700411
MUSE Marc Record: Download for The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe