Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Title Page, Copyright Page, Dedication

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

read more

Acknowledgments

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

I would not have been able to write this book without the assistance of a number of individuals. First and foremost, my wife, Lara Grow, and father, Michael Grow, dutifully reviewed drafts of each chapter as they were being written, providing invaluable substantive and editorial guidance. The book...

read more

Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-4

The United States Supreme Court’s 1922 decision in Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball Clubs ranks among the most frequently criticized opinions in Supreme Court history. In a unanimous ruling authored by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., the...

read more

1. The Rivalry Begins

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 5-21

“It will be war to the hilt with organized baseball from this time forth,” exclaimed J. Edward Krause. “We have the money, and the money will tempt the players we want.”1 The “we” that Krause was referring to was the Federal League of Professional Base Ball Clubs, a new league that began play in...

read more

2. The Opening Salvos

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 22-45

The news of December 27, 1913, sent a shockwave throughout professional baseball: star shortstop Joe Tinker had signed a three-year contract with the Chicago Federals, or “ChiFeds,” for $12,000 per season. The future Hall of Famer—immortalized in Franklin P. Adams’s poem “Baseball’s Sad Lexicon”...

read more

3. The Federal League Strikes Back

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 46-64

Although the Federal League’s large-scale raid of organized baseball collapsed following the Illinois court’s June 1914 decision in the Chief Johnson case, the circuit was nevertheless able to convince several players to defect from organized baseball shortly after the opinion was issued. The same day...

read more

4. The Landis Case

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 66-93

“We’re going to break up organized baseball,” Federal League president Jim Gilmore excitedly exclaimed to a reporter from Baseball Magazine on the morning of January 5, 1915. “I have just come from my lawyers. We filed this bill with Judge [Kenesaw Mountain] Landis,” he explained. Gilmore...

read more

5. The Long Wait

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 94-111

Shortly after the Chicago hearing, organized baseball’s attorneys began preparing formal answers to the Federal League’s allegations on behalf of each of the twenty-one defendants. John Galvin and Ellis Kinkead, the National Commission’s lawyers, took the lead on the project.1 They drafted...

read more

6. An Aborted Trial

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 112-134

In the weeks following the dismissal of the Federal League’s antitrust suit, organized baseball worked behind the scenes to resolve its budding dispute with the Baltimore Federals. The efforts to assuage the team were primarily focused on working out an arrangement between the BaltFeds and their...

read more

7. Baltimore Goes to Trial, Again

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 135-158

Despite the press reports heralding the end of all Federal League–related litigation, the major leagues quickly learned that they had not heard the last of the Baltimore Federals. Indeed, the very same day that the team terminated its lawsuit in Philadelphia, Baltimore’s counsel sent a letter to...

read more

8. The Defense and Verdict

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 159-187

“Gentlemen of the jury, it is bad enough to have to sit for hours and listen to witnesses,” George Pepper began his opening statement, “but you are really to be commiserated where it comes to the point where you have to listen to the talk of lawyers.” “Our friends [the plaintiff’s counsel] have been...

read more

9. The Appeal and Final Decision

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 188-218

While organized baseball continued to lick its wounds following the verdict in Washington, its attorneys set to work preparing the appeal. The American League’s counsel, Benjamin Minor, began to draft a Bill of Exceptions—a required step in the appellate process at the time—in which the defense...

read more

Epilogue

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 219-228

Scholars have not been kind to Justice Holmes’s decision in Federal Baseball. The opinion ranks among the most frequently criticized in Supreme Court history, with commentators declaring it “unsatisfactory,” “irrational,” and “absurd.”1 These critics typically argue that “Holmes was clearly wrong”...

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 229-264

read more

Bibliography

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 265-272

The most important primary source materials for this project were the original court papers, trial transcripts, and judicial decisions from the relevant lawsuits, as well as the original correspondence between executives from organized baseball, their attorneys, and court officials. In particular, documents from the United States Supreme Court (Case No. 204), Court of...

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 273-282

About the Author, Publisher Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF