Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe
Publication Year: 2005
Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press
Tables and Figures
PART I: The Theoretical Framework
1 Democratic Stability and Democratic Crisis
Not all democracies that can break down actually do. This was true even for interwar Europe, where democracy faced one of its darkest moments. Yet comparative politics scholars interested in interwar Europe—and elsewhere— have traditionally asked why certain democracies collapsed. For several years, under the influence of important authors such as Alexander Gerschenkron, Seymour Martin Lipset...
2 The Challenges: Antisystem Parties
Virtually every interwar European democracy had to endure an extremist challenge to its legitimacy, but in some of the cases the nature of the challenge was such that it encouraged defection from the political center at the same time. The extremist challenge was different in each country, and each acted in a different political and institutional system. Conceptualizing those challenges as examples of ‘‘antisystem...
3 The Defense: Strategies against Extremism
What instruments are at the disposal of democratic incumbents to react to extremist challenges that threaten to take over the democratic system and turn it into something else? The existing empirical literature is not of great help in answering this question: while some country-studies on this topic exist, in general they pay little attention to comparability or cumulability of knowledge. Comparative analyses...
PART II: Case Studies
Although several ideologically antisystem parties were active in the new democratic Czechoslovakia that rose from the ashes of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the main danger to the existence of the republic came from the polarization between the Czechoslovak majority and the large German-speaking Sudeten minority, especially after 1933, when a strong extreme right-wing party opposing the existence...
In 1936–39, the Belgian democratic system had to confront its most turbulent years since World War I, its very existence put in danger by the conquest of almost a quarter of the seats in the lower chamber by three ideologically antisystem parties: Rex, the Vlaams Nationaal Verbond (VNV), and the Communist Party (PCB). Of these, the first two—Rex in particular—given their size, their aggressive political...
Finnish democracy, established with the independence of the country from Russia with the Constitution of 1919, survived not one but two serious anti-system threats during the interwar years. During the 1920s, the government met the Communist challenge, which was heavily backed by Soviet Russia, with strong repression. Although this strategy was enough to keep the Communists at bay, at the...
PART III: Comparative Perspectives
7 Defense of Democracy: Actors and Strategies in Comparative Perspective
Defending democracy from its internal enemies is more diffcult than any other form of government. To start with, democratic governments need to respect basic guarantees and rights, which substantially limits their space for maneuver: although civil and political rights were often, both de jure and de facto, restricted in the cases analyzed...
What are the implications of this study for our conception of regime change and persistence on the one hand and of the interaction between democracy and extremism on the other in interwar Europe as well as in other contexts? This chapter addresses these questions. In the first part, I discuss the empirical and theoretical...
Appendix A: Party Names and Translations
Appendix B: Government Coalitions and Alignments in Presidential Elections
Appendix C: Anti-extremist Legislation in Czechoslovakia, Finland, and Belgium
Page Count: 352
Illustrations: 3 line drawings
Publication Year: 2005
OCLC Number: 657611536
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Defending Democracy