In this Book

buy this book Buy This Book in Print
Western accounts of human vision before the nineteenth century tended to separate the bodily eye from the rational mind. This model gave way in the mid-nineteenth century to one in which the thinking subject, perceiving body, perceptual object, and material world could not be so easily separated. Christina Walter explores how this new physiology of vision provoked writers to reconceive the relations among image, text, sight, and subjectivity. Walter focuses in particular on the ways in which modernist writers such as H.D., Mina Loy, D. H. Lawrence, and T. S. Eliot adapted modern optics and visual culture to develop an alternative to the self or person as a model of the human subject. Critics have long seen modernists as being concerned with an “impersonal” form of writing that rejects the earlier Romantic notion that literature was a direct expression of its author’s personality. Walter argues that scholars have misunderstood aesthetic impersonality as an evacuation of the person when it is instead an interrogation of what exactly goes into a personality. She shows that modernist impersonality embraced the embodied and incoherent notion of the human subject that resulted from contemporary physiological science, and traces the legacy of that impersonality in current affect theory. Optical Impersonality will appeal to scholars and advanced students of modernist literature and visual culture and to those interested in the intersections of art, literature, science, and technology.

Table of Contents

  1. Cover
  2. restricted access Download |
  1. Title Page, Series Page, Copyright Page, Dedication
  2. restricted access Download |
  1. Contents
  2. pp. vii-viii
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Acknowledgments
  2. pp. ix-xii
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Introduction. Eye Don’t See: Embodied Vision, Ontology, and Modernist Impersonality
  2. pp. 1-32
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. 1 A Protomodern Picture Impersonality: Walter Pater and Michael Field’s Vision
  2. pp. 33-78
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. 2 Images of Incoherence: The Visual Body of H.D. Impersonaliste
  2. pp. 79-126
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. 3 Getting Impersonal: Body Politics and Mina Loy’s “Anti-Thesis of Self-Expression”
  2. pp. 127-170
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. 4 D. H. Lawrence’s Impersonal Imperative: Vision, Bodies, and the Recovery of Identity
  2. pp. 171-213
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. 5 Managing the “Feeling into Which We Cannot Peer”: T. S. Eliot’s Impersonal Matters
  2. pp. 214-257
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Afterword. Modernist Futurity: The “Creative Contagion” of Impersonality and Affect
  2. pp. 258-276
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Notes
  2. pp. 277-300
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Bibliography
  2. pp. 301-326
  3. restricted access Download |
  1. Index
  2. pp. 327-339
  3. restricted access Download |

Additional Information

Print ISBN
MARC Record
Launched on MUSE
Open Access
Back To Top

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.