Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Title Page, Other Works in the Series, Copyright, Dedication

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

read more

Series Foreword

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. ix-x

The MIT Press Essential Knowledge series offers accessible, concise, beautifully produced pocket-size books on topics of current interest. Written by leading thinkers, the books in this series deliver expert overviews of subjects that range from the cultural and the historical to the scientific...

read more

Acknowledgments

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. xi-xii

I would like to thank the following people (mostly family members) for offering helpful feedback on earlier drafts of this book: Ellen Balaguer, Marcella Balaguer, Melchor Balaguer, Paul Balaguer, Judy Feldmann, Michael McKenna, and two anonymous...

read more

1. Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-10

In the last few years, several people have argued that science has shown us that human beings don’t have free will. People like Daniel Wegner (a Harvard psychologist) and Sam Harris (a neuroscientist and the author of various “popular philosophy” books) claim that certain scientific...

read more

2. The Case Against Free Will

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 11-34

I want to start by presenting the arguments against free will. Later, I’ll try to figure out whether these arguments are any good, but in this chapter, I just want to formulate the arguments in the strongest way I can, as the enemies of free will conceive of them.
The central idea behind the...

read more

3. Can Religion Save Free Will?

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 35-44

It might seem that we could respond to the arguments against free will by adopting the spiritual, religious view of humans. In particular, you might think we could respond by saying something like...

read more

4. Can Philosophy Save Free Will?

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 45-54

Unlike psychologists and neuroscientists, most professional philosophers believe in free will. And most of them endorse the same response to the anti-free-will arguments. The view that these philosophers endorse is known as...

read more

5. What Is Free Will, Anyway?

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 55-78

In the last chapter, we distinguished two kinds of free will—Hume-style free will and not-predetermined free will. It’s pretty obvious that we have Hume-style free will, but this isn’t very interesting. The interesting question is whether we also have not-predetermined free will. This is...

read more

6. Can We Block the Random-or-Predetermined Argument Against Free Will?

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 79-88

Now that we know what free will would consist in, we need to move on to the task of figuring out whether we actually have it. The problem, of course, is that the two arguments against free will (the scientific argument and the random-or-predetermined argument) still stand. And...

read more

7. Can We Block the Scientific Argument Against Free Will?

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 89-120

It’s finally time to assess the scientific argument against free will and to decide whether it gives us a good reason to deny the existence of free will. In a nutshell, the scientific argument proceeds as...

read more

8. Conclusion

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 121-126

If what I’ve argued in this book is right, then the anti-free-will arguments that have been put forward recently by philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists simply don’t work. And so we don’t have any good reason to doubt the existence of free...

Glossary

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 127-130

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 131-132

Further Readings

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 133-134

Bibliography

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 135-136

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 137-139