Folklore Theory in Postwar Germany
Publication Year: 2014
Can the study of folklore survive brutal wars and nationalized misappropriations? Does folklore make sense in an age of fearsome technology? These are two of several questions this book addresses with specific and profound reference to the history of folklore studies in Germany. There in the early nineteenth century in the ideological context of romantic nationalism, the works of the Brothers Grimm pioneered the discipline. The sublimation of folklore studies with the nation's political history reached a peak in the 1930s under the Nazi regime. This book takes a full look at what happened to folklore after the end of World War II and the defeat of the Nazis. A special focus on Lutz Röhrich (1923-2006), whose work spans the decades from 1955 to 2006, makes this book a unique window into a monumental reclamation.
In 1945 Röhrich returned from the warfront at the age of twenty-three, a wounded amputee. Resuming his education, he published his seminal Märchen und Wirklichkeit (Folktale and Reality) in 1956. Naithani argues that through this and a huge body of scholarship on folktale, folksong, proverbs, and riddles over the next decades, Röhrich transformed folklore scholarship by critically challenging the legacies of Romanticism and Nazism in German folklore work. Sadhana Naithani's book is the first full-length treatment of this extraordinary German scholar written in English.
Published by: University Press of Mississippi
Title Page, Copyright, Dedication
Introduction: Does Folklore Matter?
It is fashionable today to deny the existence of the folktale and the
fairy tale on the following grounds:
1. That there are no more folk communities, which have dominant oral cultures wherein folktales and fairy tales are narrated.
2. That the print culture and commercialization of the folktale has wiped away the real folktales...
Part I. Parallel to History
1. Mega Legacies: German Folklore Studies in Historical Perspective
The legacy of Romanticism is inseparable from the very idea of folklore studies as that is where the roots of the discipline lay. Folklore has been studied under the discipline of Volkskunde in Germany. The study of folklore, however, had not been initiated as Volkskunde...
Part II. Lutz Röhrich: The Advocate for Folklore
2. Triangles of Analysis
In the 1940s when Lutz Röhrich started his study of German folktales and in the 1950s when he published his first work, Folktales and Reality, the subjects of his interest—the folktale, and the academic discipline of its study, die Volkskunde—both stood tarnished. Helge Gerndt says that at the end of World War II the discipline of...
3. Circles of Interpretation
The relationship between folktale and reality is realized in the mind of the interpreter. The expression of this interpretation influences the way folktale is perceived henceforth. This is an eternal process, like a circle. No two people receive a narrative in the same way, but not every listener makes his or her interpretation public. Making interpretations...
4. Folksong for History from Below
The wide spectrum of Röhrich’s research interests, sociopolitical concerns, and methodological shifts become significantly visible when we examine his writings over a long period of time. Gesammelte Shriften zur Volkslied- und Volksballadenforschung (Collected Writings on Folksong and Folk-Ballads Research), published 2002 contains sixteen...
Part III. Continuity of Folklore
5. Röhrich beyond German Borders
Knowledge, as it is said, has no boundaries. I read Lutz Röhrich from two perspectives: one, within the context of German folkloristics; and two, as an Indian folklorist. In this chapter I show the relevance of Röhrich beyond German context at two levels: one, his relevance to the contemporary scholarship on European and American folk and...
Page Count: 128
Publication Year: 2014
OCLC Number: 852745799
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Folklore Theory in Postwar Germany