Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Title Page, Copyright, Dedication

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. vii-viii

Acknowledgments

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. ix-xiv

read more

Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-11

On June 30, 2011, comedian Stephen Colbert launched a satirical assault on the campaign finance environment in the United States. Standing on the front steps of the Federal Election Commission building, Colbert announced that he had received approval to use his television show on Comedy Central as a vehicle to “raise unlimited monies” for his Colbert Super...

read more

1. Why Public Funding?

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 12-28

In American politics, money matters. As the role of political money has changed over time, campaign finance reforms have tried to keep pace. Regulations have been constructed to restore fairness, opportunity, and integrity to American elections. Fair elections are essential to any democratic system, but so is the absence of unreasonable restrictions on political...

read more

2. Strategic Candidates and Public Funding

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 29-45

In our search for the effects of public funding, the first step is to recognize that participation is likely to change the strategic considerations that candidates make since it dramatically affects the costs—in several areas—that they must pay to wage a viable campaign. The recognition of this dynamic is important because an altered cost-benefit calculus will...

read more

3. Campaign Time

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 46-63

Public funding holds great potential to affect the financial fortunes of participating candidates, but it is equally likely to change how they use their time. Whether the act of fundraising is “bad” in a normative sense is debatable, but it stands to reason that since public funding frees them from fundraising obligations, participating candidates are likely to pursue...

read more

4. Voting Behavior

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 64-79

Particularly during presidential election years, state legislative candidates face a challenge in capturing the attention of voters, who are more likely to focus on high-profile races. But given that full public funding heightens interaction between the public and candidates, it seems reasonable to expect that the subsidizing of campaigns will also have implications for mass voting...

read more

5. Candidate Quality

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 80-107

When it comes to assessing public funding’s efficacy as policy, no outcome has received more attention from political scientists than its potential to enhance electoral competition. This focus is understandable, given the relatively uncompetitive nature of American politics. It is a well-documented truth that when incumbents seek reelection to Congress...

read more

6. Ideology and Partisan Participation

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 108-123

Although subsidies impart a clear benefit to the fundraising-challenged, other candidates might view a publicly funded campaign as having a higher net cost than a traditionally financed one. For instance, those who can easily self-fund may find the qualification costs to be relatively onerous. More likely, however, those candidates who perceive participation...

read more

7. Clean Elections at the Supreme Court

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 124-141

On March 28, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in McComish v. Bennett, a First Amendment challenge to the matching funds provisions of Arizona’s Clean Elections law. The case was consolidated with Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett (since they were argued together, I refer to both cases with the...

read more

Conclusion

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 142-154

The Supreme Court’s decisions have narrowed the available policy options when it comes to campaign finance, but it is important to note that the Court has consistently upheld the constitutionality of optional public funding programs established in Buckley, despite ample opportunity to strike them down. The Court has held that it is the government’s prerogative...

Appendix 1

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 155-158

Appendix 2

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 159-162

Appendix 3

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 163-180

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 181-184

Bibliography

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 185-194

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 195-202