Cover Front

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. C-C

Title Page, Copyright

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. i-iv

Table of Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. v-vi

read more

Acknowledgments

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. vii-viii

Professors Darryl Gless, Norm Jones, and Richard Mallette read earlier drafts of the entire manuscript. Their kindness made me a more careful author; their criticism made this a better book. Parts of it profited from reviews and remarks by Kristin Bezio, Barbara Hanrahan, John Headley, Ritchie Kendall, Peter Lake, and Albert Rabil Jr. At Albion College, Samford University, the United States Military Academy at...

read more

Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-6

I am not a literary historian, and what follows is not another interpretation of several of Shakespeare’s plays. For decades I have been studying the religious cultures of late Tudor and early Jacobean England, particularly what Alison Shell now calls the “fierce internal debate” that “beset” the established church, which was having problems...

read more

Chapter 1: Religion Around

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 7-46

Historian Patrick Collinson suggests that “the succession was the question of questions” in late Tudor England, and I think he is quite right. For Shakespeare, who seems uninterested in the worship of— or administration of—churches around him, religion likely became newsworthy only when the whether and how of its survival in the ...

read more

Chapter 2: Around Shakespeare

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 47-86

Identifying some of the religions around the realm—the last chapter’s task—was not at all as challenging as deciding which features of each likely surfaced in the conversations of ordinary yet alert subjects. Retrieving the religion around Shakespeare—this chapter’s assignment—would be easier if it were not so difficult to locate...

read more

Interlude

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 87-88

The church got nothing in Shakespeare’s will; the academy has been a busy beneficiary. Historians have been left plenty of passages in the plays—characters and conflicts as well—that seem to be symptoms of or clues to the playwright’s piety. What Leah Marcus describes as “a fierce desire for decoding” the drama, which playgoers find forever...

read more

Chapter 3: Religious Authority

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 89-122

Predictably, the “powder plot” got the government to tighten security. James’s English subjects, save the nobility, were required to swear an oath of allegiance to the new king’s regime—and the nobility’s exemption ended after Henry of Navarre, King Henry IV of France, was assassinated in 1610. Oath takers swore to “abhor, detest, and...

read more

Chapter 4: Religious Personality

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 123-156

We have already come across Stephen Egerton preaching at Blackfriars. He was in that pulpit before Shakespeare came to London and still there in 1596 to oppose James Burbage’s plans to transform the great hall into a theater. He was preaching at Blackfriars when Shakespeare succeeded in 1608 where Burbage had failed. And, consistently,...

read more

Chapter 5: Religious Community

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 157-186

Literary Historian Stephen Greenblatt recently time-traveled to the streets of London and conjured up an “unprecedented concentration of bodies jostling, crossing and recrossing the great bridge, pressing into taverns and theaters and churches.” He suggests that the clutter may be the “key to the whole spectacle” of crowds in Shakespeare’s...

read more

Conclusion

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 187-200

Archival excavations and speculation now tempt us to accept that Robert Devereux’s partisans commissioned the Lord Chamberlain’s Men, Shakespeare’s company, to perform his “great deposition play,” Richard II, early in 1601.1 Possibly, the idea was to get Londoners to acquiesce in a regime change, for Devereux, the Earl of Essex, was...

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 201-222

Bibliography

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 223-245

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 246-256

Cover Back

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. BC-BC