Deaf Students and the Qualitative Similarity Hypothesis
Understanding Language and Literacy Development
Publication Year: 2013
Published by: Gallaudet University Press
Title Page, Copyright
The main purpose of this book is to describe the theoretical underpinnings and to synthesize the findings of research based on or related to the qualitative similarity hypothesis (QSH). Although the targeted population is children and adolescents who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh), it is important to apply our understanding of the development of English in other populations of struggling readers and writers...
1 Introduction to the Qualitative Similarity Hypothesis
In this introductory chapter we provide a general overview of the construct known as the qualitative similarity hypothesis (QSH) (Paul, 2010, 2012; Paul & Lee, 2010; Paul & Wang, 2012) and establish the tenor for the remainder of this book. The QSH is a descriptive, testable hypothesis (or construct), with micro and macro components (subconstructs), and is based on a synthesis of empirical and reason-integrative research
2 English Language Development
Historically, the development of language in children and adolescents who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh) has been one of the most, if not the most, contentious educational issue (Moores, 2001, 2010; Paul, 2009; Quigley & Kretschmer, 1982). More than 30 years ago, King (1981) asserted that the question of language acquisition is actually a bipartite question: (1) How do deaf children learn language? and (2) How...
3 English Language Learners
The U.S. Department of Education report, the Condition of Education 2011 (Aud et al., 2011), estimates that, in 2009, approximately 21% (or 11.2 million) of children ages 5 to 17 years spoke a language other than English at home (i.e., language minority learners), and 5% (or 2.7 million) spoke English with difficulty (i.e., English language learners [ELLs]; see a review of the different terms associated with ELLs in Paul &...
4 English Literacy Development
English language development is our first and by far our most important intellectual accomplishment. English literacy development is our second. The development of English literacy is a lifelong intellectual process of gaining meaning from written language. The key to literacy in English is learning to read, a complex process that begins with through-the-air language proficiency and culminates in deep understanding and...
5 Research on Children With Language/Literacy Difficulties
As reiterated throughout this book, literacy is a language-based skill, and thus difficulties in language development can negatively affect literacy achievement. Numerous studies have supported the correlation between language difficulties and literacy difficulties (e.g., Bishop & Adams, 1990; Catts, 1993; Catts, Fey, Tomblin, & Zhang, 2002; Hall & Tomblin, 1978; Silva, McGee, & Williams, 1987; Tomblin et al., 1997). It...
6 Evidence- and Reason-Based Instructional Strategies
Intervention studies are a form of applied research; they examine the effectiveness of a specific instructional approach, method, program, or set of activities on students’ learning. Researchers conduct intervention studies to establish direct links between the intervention and anticipated growth in students’ knowledge and skills. In this chapter, we review literacy-focused intervention studies that have been conducted recently...
7 Understanding and Conducting Research on Language and Literacy
Understanding how to teach or develop English language or literacy in children and adolescents who are d/Deaf and hard of hearing (d/Dhh) has been challenging, and frustrating, for scholars, researchers, and educators. From one perspective, we know more about the natures of English language and literacy than we do about the manner in which to facilitate their growth in individuals (see discussion in Paul,...
8 From the Past to the Future: Reflections on the QSH
In this chapter are two essays in which David Bloome, Kouider Mokhtari, and Carla Reichard reflect on the merits of the qualitative similarity hypothesis (QSH). The contributors are well known in their respective fields and evaluate the QSH with respect to their own epistemological and research paradigms. We respond to selective remarks in these essays in Chapter 9....
9 Conclusion: Reflections and Directions
The qualitative similarity hypothesis (QSH) is not a novel construct—whether it (as well as other developmental similarity models) qualifies as one of the “intelligent thoughts” that should be reexamined is left to the judgment of our readers and the community of researchers and theorists invested in exploring the development of English language and English literacy. To minimize misinterpretations and to obtain an...
About the Authors
Page Count: 336
Illustrations: 3 figures, 10 tables
Publication Year: 2013
OCLC Number: 868223089
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Deaf Students and the Qualitative Similarity Hypothesis