Publication Year: 2003
Scolnicov shows that in the Parmenides Plato addresses the most serious challenge to his own philosophy: the monism of Parmenides and the Eleatics. In addition to providing a serious rebuttal to Parmenides, Plato here re-formulates his own theory of forms and participation, arguments that are central to the whole of Platonic thought, and provides these concepts with a rigorous logical and philosophical foundation. In Scolnicov's analysis, the Parmenides emerges as an extension of ideas from Plato's middle dialogues and as an opening to the later dialogues.
Scolnicov’s analysis is crisp and lucid, offering a persuasive approach to a complicated dialogue. This translation follows the Greek closely, and the commentary affords the Greekless reader a clear understanding of how Scolnicov’s interpretation emerges from the text. This volume will provide a valuable introduction and framework for understanding a dialogue that continues to generate lively discussion today.
Published by: University of California Press
Title Page, Copyright
List of Tables and Figures
This book has been a long time in the making. It resulted from a growing awareness, over almost twenty years, of the importance of the Parmenides for the understanding of Plato’s mature metaphysics and of the gradual realization that nothing short of a line-by-line commentary could do justice to its intricacies and its far-reaching implications. ...
Of all Plato’s dialogues, the Parmenides is notoriously the most difficult to interpret. Scholars of all periods have violently disagreed about its very aims and subject matter. The interpretations have ranged from reading the dialogue as an introduction to the whole of Platonic—and more often Neoplatonic—metaphysics1 ...
The pedigree of the story is very carefully established. Cephalus tells us what Antiphon told him that Pythodorus reported of the conversation between Parmenides, Zeno, and Socrates. The other dialogue in which we have such an elaborate framework is the Symposium, and there Plato seems to be very serious about Diotima’s speech, ...
Part I: Aporia
Χωρίς (130b2, b3, b4), ‘apart’, is used by the historical Parmenides when first introducing (illusory) plurality. (Cf. fr. 8.56.) True, it is Socrates who brings up the term in this discussion, at 129d7—but as one aspect or mode of the forms’ being. Socrates says he ‘would admire him wonderfully’ who would show forms both to be apart and to mix with each other. ...
Part II: Euporia
Parmenides’ method is now applied to his own hypothesis: the one, or (as Plato rephrases it) ‘if (the) one is’.1 So far, there is no difference between hypothesizing the one and hypothesizing that the one is. We do not yet have the distinction between an object (or the corresponding term) and a state of affairs (or the corresponding proposition). ...
Index of Greek Words and Expressions
Page Count: 205
Publication Year: 2003
OCLC Number: 56025495
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Plato’s <i>Parmenides</i>