Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-2

Title Page, Copyright

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. iii-iv

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. v-v

read more

Preface

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. vii-xv

It was three o’clock in the afternoon when a crackling voice announced over tin-pot loudspeakers that the polls were now closed. I was sitting in the courtyard of Barangay Commonwealth High School, located in a poor and crowded section of Quezon City, the largest city in the Philippines and a part of Metro Manila. The school was serving as a polling place for the 2004 ...

Abbreviations

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. xvii-xviii

read more

1. When Good Reforms Go Bad

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-20

Poll fraud and error take a variety of forms. Ineligible voters can register illegally. Eligible voters can register in more than one locale. Spurious voters can impersonate registered ones, often those who died recently or are out of town. Campaign operatives can intimidate voters, buy their votes, or commandeer polling stations. Poll workers can stuff ballot boxes or miscount ...

read more

2. Lawmakers: Legal Disenfranchisement

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 21-60

Lawmakers sometimes enact clean election measures that cause vote depression. Typically, this depression occurs when legislators impose regulations upon people who differ in their ability or disposition to comply with those regulations out of fear, distrust, embarrassment, political conviction, fi nancial constraint, or the like. These differences effectively put up obstacles to ...

read more

3. Election Officials and Poll Workers: Administrative Exclusion

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 61-97

Clean election laws, as we have seen, sometimes become vehicles of disenfranchisement. But the depressive effect of new clean election measures can crystallize not only at the moment of formulation but also at the stage of implementation. In an effort to clean up elections, lawmakers often legislate new rules with no obvious disenfranchising import. Nevertheless, election ...

read more

4. Parties, Candidates, and Their Agents: Partisan Demobilization

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 98-124

Sometimes clean election reforms damage the quality of democracy directly. When lawmakers enact restrictive voter registration procedures, participation rates decline as a direct result. When election administrators remove eligible voters from the registry, people are immediately excluded. Sometimes, however, the damage to democracy is indirect. Lawmakers and election officials ...

read more

5. Civic Educators: Disciplinary Reaction

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 125-149

Election watchdog groups, public-minded corporations, government election bodies, reformist political parties, and other civic educators sometimes try to clean up dirty electoral practices by teaching ordinary voters to change their behavior. The goal of this education, typically, is to convince people to obey existing election laws, whether it be to vote secretly, to refrain ...

read more

6. Remedies

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 150-196

In this book I have explored how clean election reforms—reforms designed to reduce fraud and error in the casting and counting of votes—have sometimes damaged the quality of democracy in a range of cases, both historical and contemporary. I found, in fact, three broad ways in which reform can harm democracy. Clean election reform can result ...

Appendix

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 197-215

References

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 217-233

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 235-243