Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF

p. v

Acknowledgments

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. vii-viii

read more

Introduction

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-12

Jean-Luc Marion’s dense and provocative writings have ignited both devotees and vehement critics. A member of l’Académie française, he has enlivened debates within and also between phenomenological and theological discourses.1 As a historian of philosophy, he is admired as one of the leading interpreters of Descartes writing today.2 Yet as a...

read more

1. Sightings: The Location and Function of Patristic Citation in Jean-Luc Marion’s Writing

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 13-43

The purpose of this first chapter is to ascertain the places and the ways in which Jean-Luc Marion cites the church fathers, particularly with an eye to the Greek apophatic tradition and, most specifi cally, to Dionysius1 and Gregory of Nyssa. The task is quite discrete: Whom does Marion cite? How frequently? In what works? And most importantly, why? ...

read more

2. How to Avoid Idolatry: A Comparison of “Apophasis” in Gregory of Nyssa and Dionysius the Areopagite

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 44-78

In the previous chapter I illustrated how Marion retrieves Gregory of Nyssa and Dionysius in one register, employing Gregory’s words in the service of an exposition of Dionysius and allowing one to speak in place of the other. The purpose of this chapter is to call into question a univocal retrieval of this sort and to examine the significant differences...

read more

3. Giving a Method: Securing Phenomenology’s Place as “First Philosophy”

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 79-108

Marion’s philosophical enterprise is directed by two primary motivations: first, the desire to free phenomena from all idolatrous restraints and all conditions; and second, the propulsion to show the possibility of all phenomena appearing as proper objects of philosophical inquiry. In order to bring these two concerns together, Marion must provide a...

read more

4. Interpreting “Saturated Phenomenality”: Marion’s Hermeneutical Turn?

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 109-129

In the previous chapter I emphasized one motivational pull in Marion’s philosophy: the search for a rigorous philosophical methodology that yields certain and universal results in order to claim a place for phenomenology as “first philosophy.” In this chapter I propose to examine a tendency in Marion’s thought that is equally strong yet pulls in a ...

read more

5. The Apparent in the Darkness: Evaluating Marion’s Apophatic Phenomenology

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 130-154

Marion’s prose can be obscure. At times such obscurity is unavoidable. Marion plumbs the depths of dark matters: the resistance of given phenomena to objectification, the incomprehensibility of God, the long and deep apophatic traditions of Christianity. Such questions and such retrievals elude the clarity of a bright morning. Yet we must ask: What is...

read more

Conclusion

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 155-160

The aim of this study has been to ask how resilient the tensions in Marion’s thought are under the lens of his fascinatingly rich, yet uneasy retrieval of the Greek apophatic tradition. I argued that, despite abundant evidence of the sophistication and comprehensiveness of his knowledge of patristic writings, the Fathers too often function homogeneously as a...

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 161-207

Select Bibliography

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 209-228

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 229-235