Prehension and Hafting Traces on Flint Tools
Publication Year: 2010
Published by: Leuven University Press
Title Page, Copyright
The research presented in this book relies on the doctoral research I performed during 1997-2002 at the Prehistoric Archaeology unit at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium) under the supervision of Pierre M. Vermeersch. I thank him sincerely for his guidance, his input and the numerous discussions I had with him. ...
List of Figures
List of Plates
List of Tables (CD-rom)
As long as prehistoric research goes back, people have been interested in what stone tools were used for. Semenov (1957, English translation 1964) was the first to deal systematically with this question and to come up with a technique that made answers conceivable. ...
2. Research Methodology
The turbulent background of use-wear studies necessitates an extensive discussion of the research methodology. After all, one of the main causes of scepticism and disbelief towards microscopic functional research in its initial phases was the lack of a sound methodology, ...
3. Prehension and Hafting Traces: Dream or Reality?
To test whether prehension and hafting traces are produced, it is sufficient to analyse the stone tool before and after it was used hand-held / hafted; when the results from the latter analysis differ from the first, the issue is proven. Two procedures are followed. In the first test, tools are drawn (not analysed) before use and it is examined whether macroscopic wear, in particular scarring, forms. ...
4. Prehension Traces – Dominant Variable: Material Worked
Semenov once stated: “However hard the stone, traces of rubbing by the hand were usually left on it, if the tool was used without a handle. Friction of flint against skin, particularly when dusty and covered with sandy particles, gradually polished the surface.” (Semenov 1964: 14). ...
5. Hafting Traces – Dominant Variables I: Use Motion and Material Worked
Several variables influence the formation of hafting traces. Dominant variables partially determine the process of hafting trace formation, while secondary variables merely cause some variations on an existing pattern. It is assumed that lack of understanding of dominant variables may result in misinterpretations, ...
6. Hafting Traces – Dominant Variables II: Hafting Material and Hafting Arrangement
Understanding the impact of hafting material and hafting arrangement on the formation of hafting traces is essential for any identification beyond the distinction between hand-held and hafted tools. The influence of both variables is identified and it is examined whether it proves to be independent of other predominant variables. ...
7. Hafting Traces – Secondary Variables
Secondary variables do not determine the formation of hafting traces; they merely cause slight variations on an existing pattern. Knowledge of their impact is nevertheless important but it will not fundamentally change interpretations, or influence their certainty level. Six secondary variables are dealt with: ...
8. Indirect Evidence of Hafting
Some evidence may indirectly indicate hafting. Tangs and notches are probably what come to mind right away, but their link with hafting needs to be addressed in a systematic way on an archaeological level (Rots 2002c). Other wear data may however provide proven clues for hafting; the most obvious examples are the distribution of use-wear traces over the active part and fractures. ...
9. Blind Test
The final blind test can be categorised as gradual in approach. All methods were used, but one after the other and more or less independently of each other. This test, as well as a more integrated one, was published (Rots et al. 2006). Tools were first analysed on a macroscopic level, next on a low power level, and finally on a high power level. ...
The importance of functional studies which include hafting and integrate other site information (typology, technology, spatial data) lies at different levels. On an artefact level, not just use (Plisson 1982; Vaughan 1985; Symens 1986; Beyries 1987a), but also the prehensile mode can be determined, ...
11. General Conclusions
While prehistoric stone tool hafting has been considered important for decades, in terms of both technological and cognitive evolutions, it has been hard to design methods which allow detailed insight into the introduction of hafting and its evolution through time. The main reason is that handles were manufactured from organic materials and these are only rarely preserved. ...
Annex I: Trace Attributes
Annex II: General Table of Experiments
Page Count: 298
Publication Year: 2010
OCLC Number: 715171764
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Prehension and Hafting Traces on Flint Tools