Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-3

Title Page

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 4-4

Copyright

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 5-7

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. vii-9

read more

Acknowledgments

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. ix-11

William Hart-Davidson deserves extra-special thanks for all of his professional advice and mentoring over the last several years. I could not have conducted the study or written this book without his time and attention. Dr. Hart-Davidson provided the intellectual framework for many of my ideas; his ideas, which he so generously shared, are peppered throughout these pages...

read more

1. Copyright and Composing: Invention and Digital Writing

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-22

Copyright law and the issues around it increasingly intersect the interests of academics, and for that reason educators are not hesitating to participate in public forums where legal policy is made. An example of this participation is the recent letter submitted by the CCCC (Conference on College Composition...

read more

2. The Meaning of Misunderstanding among Digital Writers

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 23-43

In this chapter, I analyze the survey data gathered in the first phase of the study by examining the presence of certain variables such as number of students, teachers, and other participants; levels of copyright knowledge among the population; and levels of chilled speech. In the next chapter, I continue the discussion I start here and examine possible differences between the presences of certain variables in particular populations, such as ...

read more

3. The Rhetoric of Truth

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 44-60

This chapter takes a rhetorical view of the survey findings and methodology. I spend time elaborating on this rhetorical view because a survey is typically seen as a quantitative method—it permits counting and objectification of the data it elicits. Because there has been controversy about the need for and legitimacy of quantitative methods and those research methods that rely on numbers and counting in rhetoric and composi-...

read more

4. Seven Digital Writer Multimedia Vignettes

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 61-91

Once I administered the large-scale digital survey examining respon-dents’ knowledge of, attitudes toward, and behavior involving copyright and digital writing, I moved on to the interviews. Using criterion-based sampling, I selected seven survey respondents for participation in discourse-based interviews. All interviewees were students who had taken the survey; all were from one university (but spanned a broad range of ...

read more

5. A Remixed Theory of (Digital) Authorship

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 92-117

A s part of the mixed-methods approach, in the next couple of chapters, I integrate and synthesize the data from the surveys and the inter-views. First, I discuss a framework, a digital-context, remediated theory of Foucault’s “author-function” mixed with ANT, a theory of authorship reaching beyond the traditional “literary author” and deriving in part from my empirical work with “live” digital writers and their texts. Next, ...

read more

6. Toward a Metatheory of Rhetorical Invention in Digital Environments

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 118-138

...problem. . . . Then began the faint call for the reinstatement of the lost art of invention—the art of discovering “what to say,” In this chapter I offer an inventional heuristic that takes into account the theory of authorship I developed in chapter 5. The inventional heuristic I offer in this chapter better situates the seven rhetorical topics (probability, copyright, fair use, ethics, design, culture, and employer requirements) ...

read more

7. Implications for the Future

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 139-166

A theory of rhetorical invention is important to have when conducting research, teaching, or even trying to change the law. In this chapter, I’m going to try to outline ways that this study and its accompanying ideas can be useful as we move forward. First, I examine implications for future research. I next discuss curriculum issues and implications, outlining ways to use Section E of the survey as a portable teaching tool—including some ...

Appendix 1. Institutions with Confirmed Participation (N = 64)

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 167-168

Appendix 2. Digital Survey

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 169-179

Appendix 3. Answer Key for Survey Section E: Knowledge and Understanding of Fair Use

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 180-186

Appendix 4. Interview Protocols: Sample Interview Questions

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 187-188

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 189-196

References

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 197-214

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 215-232

read more

Author Biography

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 233-233

Martine Courant Rife is a professor at Lansing Community College, where she teaches writing. Her work has most recently appeared in Technical Communication, Computers and Composition, Kairos, Teaching English in the Two-Year College, and E-learning and Digital Media. Rife is the 2007 recipient of the Frank R. Smith Outstanding Journal Article Award ...

Back Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 234-234