Inside an Experimental Youth Court
Publication Year: 2012
Published by: NYU Press
There are many people I wish to thank for helping to make this book possible. My time with two organizations — Save Our Sons and Daughters (SOSAD) in Detroit and the Harlem Writers Crew in New York — set me on this path originally. Thanks to Clementine, Terry, Greg, Andy, Avery, and all the kids for sharing your worlds...
Introduction: An Experiment in Youth Justice
Terell, a 15-year-old black Juvenile Offender, made his way hesitantly through the low gate in the courtroom when his name was called. Judge Michael Corriero looked over the notes in front of him. Terell had not been meeting the requirements...
1. Calendar Days in the Youth Part: Mundanity and Drama
“Calendars days” — usually Fridays — were set aside in the Manhattan Youth Part for the routine processing of ongoing cases. Sometimes there were new cases on for the first time, but the majority of cases on a typical calendar day were on for “control dates” or “updates” — checking in on cases awaiting the...
2. Creating the “Juvenile Offender”
New York’s 1978 Juvenile Offender Law was the first in the country that allowed criminal prosecution of youth under age 16 without juvenile court oversight. As such it represented a significant moment of rupture in the history of the American juvenile justice system.1 Fox Butterfield, Pulitzer Prize – winning...
3. Rehabilitation, Youth Part Style
When his name was called in the Youth Part, Simon, a black youth, strode from the audience where he had been waiting with his aunt and took a seat next to his lawyer. He moved with the confidence of a seasoned veteran of the court. The judge announced that Simon was ready for sentence and...
4. Individualized Justice in a Criminal Court
One of the main tenets of the early juvenile justice movement was the emphasis on the need for individualized justice — the idea that the punishments meted out or treatment and social welfare interventions prescribed for young offenders were to be based on the circumstances, history, and life conditions...
5. Managing Contradictions
The kids in the Manhattan Youth Part were teenagers and as such did not pay rent or have full-time jobs, and most were dependent upon parents or guardians for food, shelter, clothing, transportation, and the like. As non-adults, they were expected...
6. Judging the Court, Judging Transfer
My goal in this ethnography has been to document the law in action and shed light on how youths are constructed, or not constructed, as adults through the process of criminal prosecution. I tried to uncover how the criminal prosecution of adolescents was undertaken in one court in one jurisdiction and, in the...
Conclusion: Kids Will Be Kids
In late 2007, Judge Michael Corriero retired from the Supreme Court of New York. The work of the Manhattan Youth Part continues under the guidance of a new judge with new staff; another judge dedicated to the work of this specialized criminal court and, in his own unique way, to ideals of child-saving...
About the Author
Carla J. Barrett is Assistant Professor of Sociology at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York...
Publication Year: 2012
OCLC Number: 843209618
MUSE Marc Record: Download for Courting Kids