Cover

pdf iconDownload PDF
 

Contents

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. v-vi

Illustrations

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. vii-x

read more

Preface: “What Follies and Monstrous Barbarities”

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. xi-xvii

In 1841, fourteen years before he would announce himself to the world as the no-holds Bard of All Things, young Walter Whitman began plying the rough-and-tumble world of New York’s newspaper scene with gritty articles depicting life in the Big Bad City. Competing ...

read more

Acknowledgments

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. xix-xxiv

The idea for this book was hatched on a windswept and hard-raining night in the spring of 1999, when I found myself standing with thousands of other death penalty abolitionists outside California’s San Quentin Prison, where we were protesting the execution that was ...

read more

Chapter One. The Second Great Awakening and the “Grotesque Sublime” of Antebellum America

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 1-62

The winter and spring of 1843 found politically minded New Yorkers in an uproar. While the pros and cons of Texas annexation, Martin Van Buren’s anticipated return from oblivion to presidential contention, possible war with Britain over Oregon, the “cold water” frenzy of ...

read more

Chapter Two. O’Sullivan and Cheever’s Death Penalty Debate, 1835–1842, and “The Highest Interests of Humanity”

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 63-128

The first stage of the New York death penalty debates began in 1835, when Governor William Learned Marcy, perhaps recalling the complexities of the death penalty cases he adjudicated while serving on the New York Supreme Court from 1829 to 1831, appointed a committee ...

read more

Chapter Three. O’Sullivan and Cheever’s Death Penalty Debate of 1843 and “The Great Merciless Machine of Modernity”

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 129-209

In the spring of 1842, following the New York state legislature’s second rejection of John L. O’Sullivan’s “Proposed Act” to abolish the death penalty, both O’Sullivan and George B. Cheever returned from Albany to New York City, where O’Sullivan resumed his editorship of ...

read more

Conclusion. Capital Punishment and the Dilemmas of Antebellum Modernity

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 211-222

In 1852 Herman Melville published one of his strangest books, Pierre, or the Ambiguities. Apparently intended to be a best-selling romance novel, something went so wrong that the Boston Post railed that “the amount of utter trash” in the novel was “almost infinite.” The Albion chastised ...

Appendix. The Liberator Attacks the Death Penalty, 1842–1843

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 223-227

Notes

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 229-280

Bibliography

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 281-306

Index

pdf iconDownload PDF

pp. 307-342