In the Public Interest
Medical Licensing and the Disciplinary Process
Publication Year: 2012
Published by: Rutgers University Press
Title Series Information
Many people provided different kinds of support for this project. My fellow medical board members and their staff from across the country, the staff of the Federation of State Medical Boards, and my colleagues from the Citizen Advocacy Center taught me how to be a public member and what medical boards did. ...
Introduction. Medical Boards and the Public Interest
We know from numerous surveys that most of us are satisfied with our personal doctors. And yet doubts occasionally surface as to whether a doctor did the right thing or put our interests first. How do we know our physicians are competent, ethically fit, and have our best interests at heart? ...
Chapter 1. Public Member, Researcher, and Public Sociologist: The Genesis of a Project
My position as a board member evolved over time. I started as a citizen doing my civic duty, a member of society who happened to be a sociologist, invited to serve first on Board A, then Board B. With the passage of time, my role as a committed intellectual made itself felt, and I slowly became an organic ...
Chapter 2. How Licensure Became a Medical Institution
Eliot Freidson argues that the handful of occupations deemed to be “professions” proper have credentialed practitioners given the exclusive right to provide designated services.1 Other social scientists provide lists of characteristics of professions or stages distinguishing emerging professions. ...
Chapter 3. Public Participation: The Federal Bureaucracy Starts a Public Dialogue
George Bernard Shaw saw the medical profession as self interested: “[Medical practice] is quite unregulated except by professional etiquette, which, as we have seen, has for its object, not the health of the patient or of the community at large, but the protection of the doctor’s livelihood and the concealment of his errors.”1 ...
Chapter 4. The State, the Media, and the Shaping of Public Opinion
Local medical societies often resisted changes, yielding only when media campaigns grew too hot and when boards found they had less to do since licensure issues were largely resolved by the use of national exams.1 As George Bernard Shaw argued in the 1930s, “In the main, then, the doctor learns that if he gets ahead ...
Chapter 5. Rhetorics of Law, Medicine, and Public Interest Shape Board Work
The language of public protection slowly crept into board work, but it is still often overwhelmed by the discourses of medicine and law in shaping deliberations. The language of “protecting the public” began to appear regularly in the Federation Bulletin in the 1970s and was heard increasingly at Federation meetings. ...
Chapter 6. Medical and Legal Discourses in Investigatory Committees
By the end of the twentieth century board members took their disciplinary authority seriously, framing their goal as public protection. About 12 percent of cases largely concerned incompetence and negligence, but the majority focused on what Dr. Edmund Pellegrino considered character issues or what Charles Bosk ...
Chapter 7. Hearing and Sanction Deliberations: Transparency and Fact Construction Issues
Most “disastrous duffers,” as described by George Bernard Shaw, settle their cases prior to hearings: “We may guess that the medical profession, like other professions, consists of a small percentage of highly gifted persons at one end, and a small percentage of altogether disastrous duffers at the other.”2 ...
Chapter 8. Democratic Deliberation and the Public Interest
For decades critics have wondered if letting professions police themselves was like allowing foxes to guard the chicken coop.1 The licensure movement unfolded under the banner of ensuring quality of service and weeding out bad apples within the profession—a public-minded rationale, to be sure, yet as this book ...
Conclusion. An Exercise in Democratic Governance
While bringing this project to a close, I did the paperwork required for my board reappointment. The process has grown more complicated in recent years, with extra forms and documents to produce. The change was made in the name of “good government,” but it reminds us how difficult achieving the intended outcome ...
Page Count: 272
Publication Year: 2012
Series Title: Critical Issues in Health and Medicine
Series Editor Byline: Edited by Janet Golden and Rima D. Apple See more Books in this Series
MUSE Marc Record: Download for In the Public Interest